2015
DOI: 10.15560/11.5.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filling gaps and a new state record of Xenopholis scalaris (Wucherer, 1861) (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

Abstract: Abstract:We present the first record of the Dipsadidae snakes Xenopholis scalaris for the state of Rio de Janeiro and a general distribution map for this species. This record for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest expands the known geographical distribution of X. scalaris and reveals that its populations might not be isolated or disjunctive, but rather rare in this biome. We also provide some recommendations for future conservation of X. scalaris.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(10) hemipenial body ornamented with lateral spines and dispersed papillae (vs. hemipenial body ornamented with hooked spines and longitudinal plicae in X. scalaris, and hemipenial body ornamented with hooked spines in X. undulatus); (11) iris brown (vs. pupil red in X. scalaris); (12) neural spine of vertebrae with a narrow septum perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of body (vs. septum absent in X. scalaris); (13) vomerian process of premaxillae overlapping vomers (vs. contacting anteromedial portion of vomers in X. scalaris); (14) nasal process present (vs. absent in X. undulatus); (15) pair of nasals smaller than frontals (vs. about the same length of frontals in X. scalaris); (16) dorsal crests of parietal contacting each other (vs. not contacting each other in X. scalaris and X. undulatus); (17) contact between frontals and postorbitals present (vs. no contact in X. scalaris); (18) contact between supratemporals and supraoccipital present (vs. absent in X. undulatus); (19) ten palatine teeth (vs. seven in X. scalaris); (20) 23 teeth in the pterygoids (vs. 28 in X. scalaris and 14 X. undulatus).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(10) hemipenial body ornamented with lateral spines and dispersed papillae (vs. hemipenial body ornamented with hooked spines and longitudinal plicae in X. scalaris, and hemipenial body ornamented with hooked spines in X. undulatus); (11) iris brown (vs. pupil red in X. scalaris); (12) neural spine of vertebrae with a narrow septum perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of body (vs. septum absent in X. scalaris); (13) vomerian process of premaxillae overlapping vomers (vs. contacting anteromedial portion of vomers in X. scalaris); (14) nasal process present (vs. absent in X. undulatus); (15) pair of nasals smaller than frontals (vs. about the same length of frontals in X. scalaris); (16) dorsal crests of parietal contacting each other (vs. not contacting each other in X. scalaris and X. undulatus); (17) contact between frontals and postorbitals present (vs. no contact in X. scalaris); (18) contact between supratemporals and supraoccipital present (vs. absent in X. undulatus); (19) ten palatine teeth (vs. seven in X. scalaris); (20) 23 teeth in the pterygoids (vs. 28 in X. scalaris and 14 X. undulatus).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes small to moderate-sized snakes (300-450 mm), with cryptozoic lifestyle (i.e., underneath soil surface and high humidity habitats) [3][4][5][6], feeding primarily on anurans [4,[7][8][9], but occasionally also lizards [6]. Members of the genus are widely distributed in the cis-Andean Neotropics: Xenopholis scalaris ranges from the cis-Andean portion of South America along the ombrophilous forests of Colombia, Guianas, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Brazil, with disjunct populations along the Atlantic Forest [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]; Xenopholis undulatus is distributed in Paraguay and also in open areas of the Brazilian Shield, from Maranhão south to Paraná [13]; and Xenopholis werdingorum occurs at the Chiquitanos forests of Bolivia and within the Pantanal wetlands [5,13,17,18]. Due to their small body sizes and secretive lifestyle, species of this genus are rarely found [3,7], resulting in poor representation in herpetological collections and scarce literature regarding their biology and morphological variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first comprehensive inventory on the reptile species of RJ state was published about 15 years ago (Rocha et al, 2004), in which 127 species of reptiles were known to occur in the state (one crocodilian, seven amphisbaenians, nine chelonians, 28 lizards and 82 snakes). A number of subsequent studies have increased the knowledge on reptile composition of RJ by inventorying areas in the state (e.g., Citeli et al, 2016;Rocha et al, 2018;Martins et al, 2019) extending the geographic distribution of some species (e.g., Silveira, 2008;Goyannes-Araújo et al, 2009;Hamdan et al, 2015), describing new taxa (e.g., Fernandes et al, 2010;Prates et al, 2020), and providing new records of non-indigenous species (e.g., Siciliano et al, 2014;Oliveira et al, 2018). The recent advances, along with a number of additional taxonomic adjustments through the years (e.g., Sturaro et al, 2018;Hoogmoed et al, 2019), made the species list of RJ become outdated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%