2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filipino DNA variation at 12 X-chromosome short tandem repeat markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidentiary DNA profile is only meaningful when compared to a known or reference profile. Generally, the weight of the evidence depends on the rarity of the profile estimated from a reference database of the relevant population [ 31 , 32 ]. To avoid possible confirmation bias, interpretation of DNA typing results from the evidence should be done before any comparison to a known profile except those assumed to be already present in the mixture (e.g.…”
Section: An Integrated System For Dna Testing In Sexual Assault Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidentiary DNA profile is only meaningful when compared to a known or reference profile. Generally, the weight of the evidence depends on the rarity of the profile estimated from a reference database of the relevant population [ 31 , 32 ]. To avoid possible confirmation bias, interpretation of DNA typing results from the evidence should be done before any comparison to a known profile except those assumed to be already present in the mixture (e.g.…”
Section: An Integrated System For Dna Testing In Sexual Assault Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation changed in 2010 with the publication of a large empirical Y‐STR mutation rate study analyzing 186 Y‐STRs in nearly 2,000 DNA‐confirmed father–son pairs, which highlighted 13 Y‐STR markers with mutation rates > 10 −2 mutations per marker per meiosis termed rapidly mutating (RM) Y‐STRs (Ballantyne et al, 2010). Followed by the first empirical demonstrations of their suitability for male relative differentiation (Ballantyne et al, 2012, 2014), many subsequent studies provided increasing evidence on the value of RM Y‐STRs for differentiating related, including closely related, and also unrelated men (Adnan, Ralf, Rakha, Kousouri, & Kayser, 2016; Alghafri, Goodwin, & Hadi, 2013; Boattini et al, 2016, 2019; Lang et al, 2017; Niederstätter, Berger, Kayser, & Parson, 2016; Robino et al, 2015; Salvador et al, 2019; Turrina, Caratti, Ferrian, & De Leo, 2016; Westen et al, 2015; Zgonjanin, Alghafri, Antov et al, 2017). In genetic genealogy too, RM Y‐STRs are advantageous as they provide improved differentiation of unrelated individuals (Ballantyne et al, 2014) and they allow distinguishing closely related from more distantly related males by taking the number of observed mutations into account (Larmuseau et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpopulation pairwise genetic distances based on Fst between the population of Bahrain and the rest of populations extracted from the literature that included Saudi, 15 Filipino, 16 Emiratis, 17 Bengali, 18 Egyptian, 19 Turkish, 20 Indian, 21 Algerian, 22 and Jewish 23 were calculated using POPTREE2 software 24 and represented by a nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NM-MDS) analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics v21.0 software to investigate the populations' structure between Bahraini population and the already mentioned populations based on Fst's genetic distances. Phylogenetic tree was constructed from allele frequency data by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method 25 via MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%