2003
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filial cannibalism in an assassin bug

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While the former describes the eating of unrelated conspecifics, the latter describes the consumption of own offspring, either eggs or young. The occurrence of filial cannibalism has been shown not only in many fish species (see Manica 2002;Klug & Bonsall 2007 for review), but also in mammals (Elwood 1991), reptiles (Huang 2008), birds (Gilbert et al 2005), crustaceans (Dumont & Ali 2004) and insects (Thomas & Manica 2003). Filial cannibalism is often associated with parental care (Manica 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the former describes the eating of unrelated conspecifics, the latter describes the consumption of own offspring, either eggs or young. The occurrence of filial cannibalism has been shown not only in many fish species (see Manica 2002;Klug & Bonsall 2007 for review), but also in mammals (Elwood 1991), reptiles (Huang 2008), birds (Gilbert et al 2005), crustaceans (Dumont & Ali 2004) and insects (Thomas & Manica 2003). Filial cannibalism is often associated with parental care (Manica 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If so, females should prefer to spawn in a nest with fewer eggs, since the likelihood of other females adding more eggs later should decrease as the nest becomes full. In addition, in species in which last eggs are laid along the periphery, it is also possible that this position is unfavourable for the eggs (Thomas and Manica 2003;Green et al 2006;Kudo 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…De fato, tanto na condição de alta quanto na de baixa disponibilidade de ninhos, machos guardiões consumiram ovos de suas desovas em frequência e quantidade similares. Diante da supressão quase total do forrageio, o canibalismo filial pode minimizar os custos energéticos do cuidado paternal sem o risco de perder a posse do sítio de nidificação e dos ovos nele contidos (Manica, 2002(Manica, , 2004 (Thomas & Manica, 2003). Apesar de não haver um ninho, machos rivais estão constantemente tentando usurpar desovas, pois isso aumenta muito a atratividade dos machos (Gilbert et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Uma forma de compensar esses custos do cuidado sem abandonar a prole é o canibalismo filial, definido como o consumo da própria prole pelo indivíduo parental (FitzGerald, 1992). De fato, o canibalismo filial é bastante comum quando há cuidado paternal e é mais provável ocorrer quando o consumo da prole pode aumentar a qualidade do cuidado (Manica, 2002(Manica, , 2004Thomas & Manica, 2003;Klug & Bonsall, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified