2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Figure-ground assignment in pigeons: Evidence for a figural benefit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous findings in the literature (e.g., Lazareva et al, 2006;Nelson & Palmer, 2007), target discrimination was faster when targets appeared on a figure than when they appeared on a ground, indicating a processing preference for figures over grounds. Importantly, this same figural advantage did not appear for our ambiguous stimuli or for separated regions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with previous findings in the literature (e.g., Lazareva et al, 2006;Nelson & Palmer, 2007), target discrimination was faster when targets appeared on a figure than when they appeared on a ground, indicating a processing preference for figures over grounds. Importantly, this same figural advantage did not appear for our ambiguous stimuli or for separated regions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In addition to our demonstration of the temporal-perception advantages of figures, others have shown that visual targets appearing on figures are discriminated faster and more accurately than are those on grounds (Lazareva et al, 2006;Nelson & Palmer, 2007;Wong & Weisstein, 1982). Although these latter studies have reported an RT difference between targets on figures and those on grounds, the cause of this figural advantage is not known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quite independently, Lazareva, Castro, Vecera, and Wasserman (2006) recently reported a related finding in pigeons. When pigeons must report the location of a target spot as being either on the figure or on the ground, by a discriminative pecking response, they learned the task more quickly and performed it more rapidly when the spot was on the figure than when it was on the ground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This dissociation is especially important in light of recent results showing strong associations between edge-assignment and attention (Nelson & Palmer, 2007;Qiu, Sugihara, & von der Heydt, 2007;Lazareva, Castro, Vecera, & Wasserman, 2006) and questions about the adequacy of attentional controls in previous SSVEP studies by Appelbaum et al (2006Appelbaum et al ( , 2008 and Parkkonen et al (2008). In the figural shape discrimination condition of Appelbaum et al, the figural region was task-relevant and, therefore, clearly attended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%