2018
DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.12160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fighting Tax Evasion by Discouraging the Use of Cash?

Abstract: We propose a bargaining model of tax evasion with a seller that offers a price discount to a buyer in exchange for a cash payment without a receipt, which allows tax evasion. We study the effect on evasion and government revenue of two policy instruments: a tax on cash withdrawals (TCW), which imposes a cost on the buyers who pay cash, and a tax rebate conditional on having the receipt. The tax rebate reduces evasion but it is costly if tax evasion is low. The TCW reduces evasion only if it is set at a suffici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding tax evasion, using 2002-2012 data from 25 European countries, Immordino & Russo (2018) found a negative relationship between the evasion rate of VAT and payments with debit and credit cards, thus showing that EPMs make evasion difficult. In an earlier study on the same topic, Immordino & Russo (2014) analyzed a collaborative tax evasion model where buyers and sellers negotiate a price discount for payment in cash in exchange for not issuing an invoice. Based on their results, a combination of two policy instruments could reduce tax evasion: a tax refund for the buyer requesting the invoice, and a tax on cash withdrawals.…”
Section: Informality and Electronic Payment Methods (Epms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding tax evasion, using 2002-2012 data from 25 European countries, Immordino & Russo (2018) found a negative relationship between the evasion rate of VAT and payments with debit and credit cards, thus showing that EPMs make evasion difficult. In an earlier study on the same topic, Immordino & Russo (2014) analyzed a collaborative tax evasion model where buyers and sellers negotiate a price discount for payment in cash in exchange for not issuing an invoice. Based on their results, a combination of two policy instruments could reduce tax evasion: a tax refund for the buyer requesting the invoice, and a tax on cash withdrawals.…”
Section: Informality and Electronic Payment Methods (Epms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li Yiting and Tang Ruyin [19] pointed out that high inflation will erode the purchasing power of cash, so people will tend to hold less cash, reducing the incentives for people to engage in underground economic activities. Another, Giovanni et al [20] propose the effect on evasion and government revenue of two policy instruments: a tax on cash withdrawals (TCW) and a tax rebate conditional on having the receipt. Their research shows the tax rebate reduces evasion but it is costly if tax evasion is low.…”
Section: The Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be a reflection of the term “one dies and one grows”. Many researchers have documented fighting financial crimes including Ponzi schemes (Fan et al , 2020; Kasim et al , 2020), money laundering (Demetis, 2018; Schneider and Windischbauer, 2008; Simser, 2013; Yamen et al , 2019), corruption (Lino et al , 2022; Stapenhurst and Langseth, 1997), asset misappropriation (Bakri et al , 2017; Karim et al , 2015), financial statement fraud (Rezaee, 2005; Shonhadji and Maulidi, 2021) and tax evasion (Immordino and Russo, 2018; Tsakumis et al , 2007). The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) recorded 39% of fraudsters commit fraud due to lifestyle behaviors beyond their capabilities and environment (ACFE, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%