2014
DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifu021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fighting Lone Mothers' Poverty Through In-Work Benefits: Methodological Issues and Policy Suggestions

Abstract: Lone mothers are overrepresented among poor people in many European countries. In 1998, in Norway, a welfare reform increased the amount of benefits and introduced working requirements. Using a quasi-experimental model, Mogstad and Pronzato (2012) find a positive effect of the reform on lone mothers' labour supply and a small reduction in poverty. Is the best result that policy makers could obtain in terms of poverty reduction? In this paper, I estimate a discrete choice model of earnings and welfare participa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, we compare the predictions of the structural model with results from a number of quasi-experimental studies on key past reforms and thus contribute to the growing body of literature that evaluates the performance of structural models by comparing simulated policy responses with the results from (quasi-)experimental studies (e.g. Attanasio et al 2011 ; Bargain and Doorley 2017 ; Brewer et al 2006 ; Cai et al 2008 ; Todd and Wolpin 2006 ; Geyer et al 2015 ; Hansen and Liu 2015 ; Pronzato 2015 ; Thoresen and Vatto 2015 ). In addition, because our structural model is fully integrated with a detailed tax-benefit calculator, we are able to study the effectiveness of various reform proposals, taking into account the budgetary effects of the behavioural responses to the reform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, we compare the predictions of the structural model with results from a number of quasi-experimental studies on key past reforms and thus contribute to the growing body of literature that evaluates the performance of structural models by comparing simulated policy responses with the results from (quasi-)experimental studies (e.g. Attanasio et al 2011 ; Bargain and Doorley 2017 ; Brewer et al 2006 ; Cai et al 2008 ; Todd and Wolpin 2006 ; Geyer et al 2015 ; Hansen and Liu 2015 ; Pronzato 2015 ; Thoresen and Vatto 2015 ). In addition, because our structural model is fully integrated with a detailed tax-benefit calculator, we are able to study the effectiveness of various reform proposals, taking into account the budgetary effects of the behavioural responses to the reform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 34 See, e.g. Attanasio et al, ( 2011 ); Bargain and Doorley, ( 2017 ); Brewer et al ( 2006 ); Cai et al( 2008 ); Todd and Wolpin ( 2006 ); Geyer et al ( 2015 ); Hansen and Liu ( 2015 ); Pronzato ( 2015 ); Thoresen and Vatto ( 2015 ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%