Fifty Years of Sustained Production from the Australian Abalone Fisheries

Abstract

The sustained production of abalone from the five state-managed (Tasmania, Victoria, South Australia, New South Wales, and Western Australia) Australian abalone fisheries has contrasted with many of those elsewhere that exhibited rapid and sustained declines in production. Australian abalone fisheries are significant at local, regional, state, national, and international scales. Key attributes are (1) harvesting, processing, and reinvestment of profits occur away from major metropolitan centers; (2) they are among the most valuable wild-catch species in all states; (3) the combined Australian abalone harvest in 2011 (>4,500 t) had a landed value of ∼AU$200M and represented 15% of the Australian total wild-catch production; and (4) this level of production made these fisheries the dominant contributor (60%) to global wild-catch abalone production. Unlike many other abalone fisheries, total catches were controlled by limited entry, quotas, size limits, and geographic boundaries, overseen by stringent compliance regimes, early in their history. Subsequently, state-based research programs, explicitly tasked with providing scientific advice to support management decisions, undertook assessments to match harvests with stock productivity. This information upon which to base management decisions contributed to long-term (>20 years) stable harvests and enabled relationships among stakeholders to develop around consideration of the information and advice for management. In general, rights-holders developed stewardship for the resource, and this has led to numerous important outcomes, including evolving resource co-management and a nationally representative industry entity, the Abalone Council of Australia. The Abalone Council of Australia, state-based industry entities, and ongoing relationships among rights-holders, fishery managers, and researchers play vital roles in addressing and overcoming current and impending challenges for these fisheries. These difficulties include (1) urban encroachment into coastal regions (the so-called "sea change" phenomenon); (2) a growing interest in access to the abalone resource, reflecting the increasing, culturally diverse Australian population; (3) the everpresent threat of illegal fishing; (4) recent total allowable commercial catch reductions, particularly in Victoria and New South Wales, to facilitate stock rebuilding; (5) changing market conditions; (6) declining profitability from increasing operational costs and appreciation of the Australian dollar; and (7) environmental changes, such as prolonged drought and warmer seas associated with shifts in climate. Overall, this review demonstrates that abalone can be harvested sustainably over extended periods, despite aspects of their demography that suggest higher vulnerability to overexploitation, providing the management systems that control harvesting activities and external impacts that encompass several key underpinning elements. This review also identifies likely challenges to sustained production and shows that the future of ...

Examining the Long-Run Relationship between the Prices of Imported Abalone in Japan

“…All Australian commercial abalone fisheries are managed with total allowable catches (TACs), which are divided into individual transferrable quotas or ITQs (Mayfield et al 2012). The use of ITQs affects economic yield from fisheries in several ways, including: control of the tonnage and thus revenue of the fleet by promoting fleet efficiency through trading of quota; and through control of biomass, which affects catch rates and costs of fishing (Costello and Deacon 2007).…”

Commercial scale invertebrate fisheries enhancement in Australia: Experiences, challenges and opportunities

“…It has been proposed that management has been unsuccessful in this species because it has been unable to focus at the correct genetic scale of the population [81] which, as a function of highly restricted dispersal, is composed of many independent substocks [82]. This view has been disputed; a recent review concluded that management over the past 40 years of this species has largely been successful, despite the 'mismatch' between genetic population scale and management units [77].…”

“…Greenlip abalone (H. laevigata) is a commercially-fished endemic mollusc on the South Coast of Australia, the subject of a moderately valued fishery with a GVP of around $20 million [77]. Evidence for a likely change in population productivity of H. laevigata under commercial scale enhancement is available from comparisons of natural recruitment versus assisted recruitment from long-term enhancement experiments [24,29,34,53,68].…”

“…A full-scale ecologically enhanced fishery increased the unit GVP (per m 2 ) by 80% ($7.36-$13.37 per m 2 ), and the total GVP by over 200% ($43,000-$138,000; Table 4). When scaled up to the area of the total Western Australian fishery, the increase in GVP would be from the current value of $8 million [95] to $23 million, or from $20 million [77] to $60 million for the entire Australian fishery.…”

Predicting the Distribution of Commercially Important Invertebrate Stocks under Future Climate

“…While present-day management of the fishery is appropriate [24], [25], forecast changes in key environmental requirements may mean that fine-scale estimates of population densities under future conditions will be required to successfully manage the long-term persistence of abalone stocks. At the moment climate change is not being considered in the fishery management plans.…”