1989
DOI: 10.1136/adc.64.6.879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fifty years of enuretic alarms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…18,19 The accepted treatment period for nocturnal enuresis was reported by Forsythe to be 12-16 weeks. 20 In the present study it was found that reduction in mean number of wet night started from 8 weeks of intervention and best results were seen after 20 weeks. However in some studies alarm intervention was given for a longer duration.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…18,19 The accepted treatment period for nocturnal enuresis was reported by Forsythe to be 12-16 weeks. 20 In the present study it was found that reduction in mean number of wet night started from 8 weeks of intervention and best results were seen after 20 weeks. However in some studies alarm intervention was given for a longer duration.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Even during the early period of using enuretic alarm devices, children wake up and learn to go to the toilet, being conditioned [12,13] . Although alarm devices have been accepted as the first choice in most of the Western countries, desmopressin is widely used because of its easy administration, rapid effect, and also because less motivation and cooperation are necessary [11,17,18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most problematic methodological issue was the treatment duration. Children were only treated for 2 weeks before crossover, which is suf®cient time to assess the effect of desmopressin but clearly insuf®cient to test the effectiveness of the alarm, as 5±12 weeks has been suggested as the mean treatment duration with an enuresis alarm [11,12]. Thus treatment success in the A+D group was arguably caused by a response to desmopressin, whereas insuf®cient duration of treatment in the A+P group must have contributed to the failure rate in this group.…”
Section: Linking Treatment To the Child's Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%