Hyperspectral Indices and Image Classifications for Agriculture and Vegetation 2018
DOI: 10.1201/9781315159331-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fifty Years of Advances in Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Agriculture and Vegetation—Summary, Insights, and Highlights of Volume II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we expect the mixture residual to impact different retrieval approaches in different ways. There is good theoretical justification to expect a significant difference in result for approaches that only use a subset of the spectral information, for example, narrowband spectral indexes (Thenkabail et al., 2018). An example using the mixture residual as a pretreatment for spectral indices is shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we expect the mixture residual to impact different retrieval approaches in different ways. There is good theoretical justification to expect a significant difference in result for approaches that only use a subset of the spectral information, for example, narrowband spectral indexes (Thenkabail et al., 2018). An example using the mixture residual as a pretreatment for spectral indices is shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common tools include narrowband spectral indices (e.g. (Thenkabail et al., 2018)) and regression approaches like Partial Least Squares (Asner & Martin, 2009; Smith et al., 2002; Townsend et al., 2003), often focusing on brightly lit closed canopies at high spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RGRI values measured for Quercus agrifolia depend on leaf age in the range of 0.5 - 1.5. SR values mainly fall into the range of 0 - 20 as observed for paddy rice fields in Italy and 10 - 20 for clonal Populus (Thenkabail et al, 2018). By contrast, the influence of chloroplast positioning is negligible for chlorophyll-dependent indices characterized by more complex formulae, such as the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…the content of water, nitrogen, lignin, cellulose, and pigments: chlorophyll, carotenoids, anthocyanins) and physiological traits (e.g. stress, changes in xanthophyll cycle pigments, fluorescence, leaf moisture) (Thenkabail et al, 2018). In particular, a large group of vegetation indices based on the visible or NIR reflectance (formulae in Supplementary Table S1) is used to assess the chlorophyll content, consisting of the classical NDVI (Rouse et al, 1974), but also SR (Rouse et al, 1974), EVI (Huete et al, 1997), ARVI (Kaufman & Tanre, 1995), RENDVI (Gitelson & Merzlyak, 1994), mRESR (Sims & Gamon, 2002), and a sum green index, (Behmann et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1960s, using satellite imagery to measure reflectance of surfaces at a scale of tens of metres has been utilised to monitor vegetation health and to attempt to estimate and forecast changes in vegetation cover and condition (Thenkabail et al, 2019). More recently, these imagery methods have been deployed in more proximal sensors (planes, drones, vehicles) that allow analysis of vegetation at higher resolutions (to sub-centimetre scales) in a research field that is sometimes referred to as 'high-throughput phenotyping' (HTP) (Chapman et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%