2005
DOI: 10.2175/106143005x41843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fifteen Years of Offgas Transfer Efficiency Measurements on Fine‐Pore Aerators: Key Role of Sludge Age and Normalized Air Flux

Abstract: Fine‐pore diffusers, often called fine‐bubble diffusers, have nearly replaced coarse bubble diffusers in municipal wastewater treatment over the past 20 years. The rapid increases in energy costs, which began in the 1970s, created financial incentives to upgrade to this more expensive and maintenance‐intensive method of aeration. Fine‐pore diffusers have the added benefit of reducing volatile organic compound stripping and reduced aeration heat loss. This paper summarizes 15 years of oxygen transfer efficiency… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the aeration efficiency, which depends on the oxygen transfer efficiency (OTE) in the aerated reactors, directly affects the cost of the wastewater treatment process. The main factors that affect OTE in wastewater treatment are reactor design (i.e., depth and shape), characteristics of the wastewater (i.e., suspended solids, temperature, and viscosity), aeration system (i.e., distribution of aeration system and type of diffusers), and ambient conditions (i.e., altitude and temperature) [9][10][11][12]. Suspended carrier elements can also affect OTE during the MBBR process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the aeration efficiency, which depends on the oxygen transfer efficiency (OTE) in the aerated reactors, directly affects the cost of the wastewater treatment process. The main factors that affect OTE in wastewater treatment are reactor design (i.e., depth and shape), characteristics of the wastewater (i.e., suspended solids, temperature, and viscosity), aeration system (i.e., distribution of aeration system and type of diffusers), and ambient conditions (i.e., altitude and temperature) [9][10][11][12]. Suspended carrier elements can also affect OTE during the MBBR process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aeration systems the oxygen transfer efficiency is a function of the air flow rate and both keep a direct relationship (Gillot, Capela-Marsal, Roustan, & Héduit, 2005;Jenkins, 2013;Liu, Li, & Zhang, 2011;Mueller et al, 2002;D Rosso et al, 2005). High water flow regimens, associated with high air flow rates, has as consequence the increase in internal bubble recirculation of gas and high surface renewal rates (interface gas -liquid) (D. Rosso, Huo, & Stenstrom, 2006).…”
Section: Measurement Oxygen Transfer In Clean Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors to be considered when studying oxygen transfer in fine-pore aeration systems covers a wide range: diffuser-related issues (Groves, Daigger, Simpkin, Redmon & Ewing, 1992;Mueller, Boyle & Popel, 2002;Diego Rosso & Shaw, 2015), aerobic reactor characteristics (Eckenfelder, 1959;Mueller et al, 2002;Pittoors, Guo & Van Hulle, 2014;Schierholz, Gulliver, Wilhelms & Henneman, 2006) and operating conditions (Henkel, 2010;D Rosso, Iranpour & Stenstrom, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third model (AM3) is inspired by Rosso et al (2005) and assumes a constant standard oxygen transfer efficiency (SOTE), but time-variant a correction factor aSOTE =/l log^ -B where aSOTE is the field oxygen transfer efficiency (-), .4 and B are model parameters (-), and ^ is a lumped variable proportional to sludge age and inversely proportional to airflow rate.…”
Section: Description Of the Wwtp And The Used Models And Datamentioning
confidence: 99%