2008
DOI: 10.1021/ci800110p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FieldScreen: Virtual Screening Using Molecular Fields. Application to the DUD Data Set

Abstract: FieldScreen, a ligand-based Virtual Screening (VS) method, is described. Its use of 3D molecular fields makes it particularly suitable for scaffold hopping, and we have rigorously validated it for this purpose using a clustered version of the Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD). Using thirteen pharmaceutically relevant targets, we demonstrate that FieldScreen produces superior early chemotype enrichments, compared to DOCK. Additionally, hits retrieved by FieldScreen are consistently lower in molecular weight than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
165
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the approach of Cheeseright et al [26], we generated a reduced version of DUD for 13 of the targets, with chemotype information added, using the ZINC codes included in their supplementary information. We used the DUD sets with MMFF94x charges for this purpose.…”
Section: Chemotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the approach of Cheeseright et al [26], we generated a reduced version of DUD for 13 of the targets, with chemotype information added, using the ZINC codes included in their supplementary information. We used the DUD sets with MMFF94x charges for this purpose.…”
Section: Chemotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate that ElectroShape is not simply a sophisticated substructure search method only capable of finding actives that share a common chemotype with the query ligand, further validation was carried out by taking into account chemotype redundancy in the DUD active sets as described by Cheeseright et al [26]. The results demonstrate that ElectroShape has good cross-chemotype enrichments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BABEL is based on the 2D-fingerprints of ligands. 17 Also compared are the popular structure-based methods Glide, 18−20 DOCK, 21 and GOLD. 22 Comparing the mean AUC values in Table 3, we observe that VS-APPLE performs comparably to the structure-based method Glide and significantly better than the other structure-based methods (DOCK and GOLD) and the ligand-based methods (ROCS and BABEL).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason behind the choice of this particular software is simply the fact that it is commercially available: the calculations have been run on the generic database that is provided in the software package making this study not dependent on in-house scripts and/or in-house collection of chemical fragments. SparkV10 (also known as the previous name of FieldStere) is a computational methodology developed and distributed by the software company Cresset [69]. SparkV10 uses Cresset's field technology to find biologically equivalent replacements for a selected moiety in the molecule under investigation, enabling the user to find new structures in new chemical space.…”
Section: Bioisosteric Replacements In Nk 1 Receptor Antagonist: a Retmentioning
confidence: 99%