“…In this kind of study it is difficult, if not impossible, to compare our approach to previous approaches from the literature due to the very different nature of the approaches, the variety of constraints taken into account or not, and the lack of standardized data set. To emphasize this challenge, in this section we present an attempt to compare our approach with an open‐source algorithm named Fields2Cover (F2C) and proposed by Mier et al (
2023). The inputs of F2C are the field polygon, the width of headlands (
), the minimum turning radius of the robot (
), and one single objective function to choose among three suggestions: minimizing the total path length, minimizing the number of half‐turns in headlands and maximizing the coverage rate.…”