Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3178876.3186040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-weighted Factorization Machines for Click-Through Rate Prediction in Display Advertising

Abstract: Click-through rate (CTR) prediction is a critical task in online display advertising. The data involved in CTR prediction are typically multi-field categorical data, i.e., every feature is categorical and belongs to one and only one field. One of the interesting characteristics of such data is that features from one field often interact differently with features from different other fields. Recently, Fieldaware Factorization Machines (FFMs) have been among the best performing models for CTR prediction by expli… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
101
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Lead: the user fills out an online form • View Content: the user views a web page such as the landing page or a product page • Purchase: the user purchases a product • Sign Up: the user signs up an account The decisive factors, i.e., the main effect terms (fields) and/or the interaction terms (field pairs) that drive a user to convert, may vary a lot among these types. Following the analysis in [24], we verify this by computing mutual information (MI) between each field pair and each type of conversion on our real-world data set described later in section 4.1. Suppose there are M unique features {x 1 , .…”
Section: Field Interaction Effects For Different Conversion Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…• Lead: the user fills out an online form • View Content: the user views a web page such as the landing page or a product page • Purchase: the user purchases a product • Sign Up: the user signs up an account The decisive factors, i.e., the main effect terms (fields) and/or the interaction terms (field pairs) that drive a user to convert, may vary a lot among these types. Following the analysis in [24], we verify this by computing mutual information (MI) between each field pair and each type of conversion on our real-world data set described later in section 4.1. Suppose there are M unique features {x 1 , .…”
Section: Field Interaction Effects For Different Conversion Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MT-FwFM is a variant of Field-weighted Factorization Machine (FwFM), which is introduced in [24] for click prediction. FwFM is formulated as…”
Section: Multi-task Field-weighted Factorization Machine (Mt-fwfm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are more complex than FMs in terms of the number of parameters and computational complexity. Field-weighted Factorization Machines [16] add additional coefficients to depict the interactions of fields, and reduce the number of model parameters compared to FFMs. These models treat features from different fields differently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%