2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/753/4/042005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Validation of the Stability Limit of a Multi MW Turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the work of Griffith and Chetan (2018), it was shown how larger blades tend to have a larger edgewise contribution to blade instability as blade structural designs at the 100 m scale are optimized for mass. These edgewise instabilities in large turbine blades have been observed experimentally and numerically by Kallesøe and Kragh (2016). The edgewise flutterlike instabilities were found to have a shallow crossover that is considered as "soft" crossover to an unstable mode due to higher structural damping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the work of Griffith and Chetan (2018), it was shown how larger blades tend to have a larger edgewise contribution to blade instability as blade structural designs at the 100 m scale are optimized for mass. These edgewise instabilities in large turbine blades have been observed experimentally and numerically by Kallesøe and Kragh (2016). The edgewise flutterlike instabilities were found to have a shallow crossover that is considered as "soft" crossover to an unstable mode due to higher structural damping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, as Griffith and Chetan have shown in their study, edgewise deformation of the blade may have a significant contribution to the flutter mode 25 . Moreover, inclusion of the finite blade deflections into the aeroelastic stability analysis of blades accounts for reduction in the flutter speed 26 . Since the main emphasis of the present study is to present a methodology to include compressibility into the aeroelastic stability analysis of wind turbine blades, structural model is simplified to include only the flapwise bending and the torsional deformations and their coupling using the geometrically linear formulation.…”
Section: Governing Equations Of the Rotating Beam‐blade Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…25 Moreover, inclusion of the finite blade deflections into the aeroelastic stability analysis of blades accounts for reduction in the flutter speed. 26 Since the main emphasis of the present study is to present a methodology to include compressibility into the aeroelastic stability analysis of wind turbine blades, structural model is simplified to include only the flapwise bending and the torsional deformations and their coupling using the geometrically linear formulation. The extension of the present study to include edgewise deformation and associated couplings; and geometrically nonlinear TWB formulation is considered to be a future extension of the present study.…”
Section: Energy Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated that there is only a small quantitative difference between a full wind turbine model and a single-blade model in the predicted flutter speed. Kallesøe and Kragh (2016)’s research showed that the geometric non-linearities caused by steady state deflection of the blade for NREL 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine with 63-m blades may also influence the aeroelastic stability of wind turbines. Furthermore, Lobitz (2004) assessed the influence of different aerodynamic models on flutter speed for MW-sized wind turbines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%