1957
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.47.5.578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Trial of Typhoid Vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulties involved in evaluating the usefulness of a particular vaccine is well illustrated in the case of human typhoid. Despite the mass of clinical and laboratory data on all cases and suspected contacts of typhoid fever, the value of typhoid vaccine has only recently been clearly established on statistical grounds (28,29). The experimental models used to assess the effectiveness of vaccines against S. typhi infections have, of necessity, employed highly artificial conditions in order to produce fatal infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulties involved in evaluating the usefulness of a particular vaccine is well illustrated in the case of human typhoid. Despite the mass of clinical and laboratory data on all cases and suspected contacts of typhoid fever, the value of typhoid vaccine has only recently been clearly established on statistical grounds (28,29). The experimental models used to assess the effectiveness of vaccines against S. typhi infections have, of necessity, employed highly artificial conditions in order to produce fatal infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent field trials with typhoid vaccines carried out in Yugoslavia indicated that the heat-phenol vaccine employed may have been more protective than an alcoholized typhoid vaccine (Cvjetanovi6, 1957). Laboratory investigations revealed that the only definite difference between these vaccines was the greater stimulation of H antibody production in rabbits by heat-phenol vaccine (Edsall et al, 1959;Standfast, 1960a), although, when tested in humans, this difference was not marked (Yugoslav Typhoid Commission, 1957).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mere survival of a statistically significant proportion of a challenged population (16) overlooks the fact that most of the survivors will have undergone a severe, nearly fatal, clinical infection. When attention has been paid to this point [as in the case of human antityphoid trials (2)], the protective value of nonliving vaccines has been shown to be barely significant (10,34). In this laboratory, only those vaccination procedures which generate a fully effective antibacterial immunity capable of eliminating a lethal dose of a highly virulent organism without the development of the clinical disease have been regarded as "protective" (3,4,7,8,9,23).…”
Section: Ipmentioning
confidence: 99%