2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field triage score (FTS) in battlefield casualties: validation of a novel triage technique in a combat environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Eastridge et al 30 at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) subsequently developed the Field Triage Score (FTS) based on 800,000 civilian records. This score uses only two components that are easily assessed in the field.…”
Section: Triage Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eastridge et al 30 at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) subsequently developed the Field Triage Score (FTS) based on 800,000 civilian records. This score uses only two components that are easily assessed in the field.…”
Section: Triage Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces deux médecins de pénétration du RAID ont effectué une catégorisation des victimes selon les principes de triage de médecine militaire et de catastrophe adaptés au triage médical tactique du RAID [1,[3][4][5]. Le premier principe d'extraction s'appuyait sur la mobilité des victimes, les valides s'extrayant rapidement par leurs propres moyens, les invalides restant au sol.…”
Section: Actions Des Médecins D'interventionunclassified
“…Xie et al 6 present designs of triage and medical evacuation systems for casualties at sea, including the storage and transmission of medical information during battlefield treatment and medical evacuation; their system consists of a medical information card, a multifunctional airbag triage vest and includes a triage classifier. Eastridge et al 7 present a novel triage algorithm that has been offered and evaluated in a combat environment based on Field Triage Score, whereas Jorma and colleagues8 present field experiences using a mobile radio frequency identification-based triage system. However, none of these systems consider the assessment of wounded soldiers and their transport priorities and employ static triage methods called simple triage and rapid treatment (START) and sort–assess–lifesaving interventions–treatment/transport (SALT), and these algorithms have poor agreement with the outcomes in real-case scenarios 9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%