2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-019-02479-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-Theoretic Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation

Abstract: We propose a field-theoretic thermodynamic uncertainty relation as an extension of the one derived so far for a Markovian dynamics on a discrete set of states and for overdamped Langevin equations. We first formulate a framework which describes quantities like current, entropy production and diffusivity in the case of a generic field theory. We will then apply this general setting to the one-dimensional Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation, a paradigmatic example of a non-linear field-theoretic Langevin equation. In p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
127
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
9
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For other field-theoretic formulations of stochastic thermodynamic concepts, in particular the stochastic entropy production, see, e.g., [27,28,29]. The derivation of the KPZ-TUR in [25] relies on a perturbational approximation in a small effective coupling parameter of the KPZ non-linearity. This approach is quite generally applicable to stochastic field-theoretic overdamped Langevin equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other field-theoretic formulations of stochastic thermodynamic concepts, in particular the stochastic entropy production, see, e.g., [27,28,29]. The derivation of the KPZ-TUR in [25] relies on a perturbational approximation in a small effective coupling parameter of the KPZ non-linearity. This approach is quite generally applicable to stochastic field-theoretic overdamped Langevin equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we discuss in the supplemental material however, there is another component of the entropy production, related to the work that the flow does against the confining potential [37,62]. This component, which does indeed depend on the value of u d , is not estimated by our inference scheme, due to the fact that u d is a field (corresponding to the velocities of the molecules of the thermal bath) which is odd under time reversal, for which the TUR does not hold [46,52,[63][64][65]]. Hence we expect that the values of σ we find close to the bubble are underestimates of the true value.…”
Section: A Colloidal Particle Trapped Near a Microbubblementioning
confidence: 90%
“…(19) (by considering arbitrary, however reasonable, forms of P 1 and P 2 ) as well as the LDF scaling, together with the analysis of possible relations allowing us to determine-or at least to give a range to bound-the critical exponents (for instance, as numerically evaluated in Refs. [37][38][39] or to determine general thermodynamic uncertainty relations 25 will be the subject of forthcoming work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Ref. 25, we do not explicitly state an expression for the Jacobian ensuing from the variable transformation from noises to heights, as it turns out that such a Jacobian does not contribute to the entropy relations. For the inverse or backward trajectories, we have…”
Section: Fluctuation Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation