2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field testing of the discrete-trials teaching evaluation form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DTI measurement tool. A DTI measurement tool was created by combining information from an established DTI evaluation form with high interobserver agreement and social validity (Jeanson et al, 2010) and a review of studies that measured treatment fidelity of DTI (Thomson et al, 2009). We recruited two boardcertified behavior analysts and obtained verbal agreement that all critical components of a discrete trial were represented.…”
Section: Setting and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DTI measurement tool. A DTI measurement tool was created by combining information from an established DTI evaluation form with high interobserver agreement and social validity (Jeanson et al, 2010) and a review of studies that measured treatment fidelity of DTI (Thomson et al, 2009). We recruited two boardcertified behavior analysts and obtained verbal agreement that all critical components of a discrete trial were represented.…”
Section: Setting and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least two observers recorded the tutors' correct and incorrect DTT behaviors using the DTTEF ; see Figure 1). The DTTEF is a 21- shown to have high face validity, high inter-observer reliability, significant discriminant validity and high convergent validity for live and videotaped scoring (Babel, Martin, Fazzio, Arnal, & Thomson, 2008;Jeanson et al, 2010). Each observer recorded tutors' correct and incorrect behavior on the DTTEF for 12 trials per task for three tasks in all phases of the study.…”
Section: Target Behaviors and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection based on direct behavior observations is a fundamental part of ABAbased interventions (Baer, Wolf, & Risley, 1968;Cooper et al, 2020;Johnston & Pennypacker, 2009). Details of data collection procedures differ between studies (Arnal et al, 2007;Babel, Martin, Fazzio, Arnal, & Thomson, 2008;Jeanson et al, 2010). However, continuous data recording is preferred (Taubman, Leaf, McEachin, Papovich, & Leaf, 2013) and should be based on evaluation criteria for the quality of service delivery (Langh, Cauvet, Hammar, & Bolte, 2017).…”
Section: The Practice Of Behavior Analytic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous data are a preferred recording method (Taubman et al, 2013) and used in evaluating the quality of service delivery (Langh et al, 2017). This was often reflected in the procedural integrity of implementations (Babel et al, 2008; Jeanson et al, 2010). Evidence shows that interventions carried out in English are more effective with native English-speakers than with non-native speakers who migrated to an English-speaking country, for example, the United States.…”
Section: The Practice Of Behavior Analytic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%