2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and Spiti

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, for recording the species presence, we adopted a three-pronged approach i.e. transects/trail surveys, questionnaire surveys, and also the remote camera traps following Pradhan et al 20 , Buckland et al 39 and Joshi et al 54 . Further, it was not logistically feasible to cover the entire area systematically due to the rugged terrain, unpredictable weather and poor resources availability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, for recording the species presence, we adopted a three-pronged approach i.e. transects/trail surveys, questionnaire surveys, and also the remote camera traps following Pradhan et al 20 , Buckland et al 39 and Joshi et al 54 . Further, it was not logistically feasible to cover the entire area systematically due to the rugged terrain, unpredictable weather and poor resources availability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardized protocols are available for human observations (Sutherland, 2008;White & Edwards, 2000), camera traps (Kays et al, 2020;Meek et al, 2014;Rovero & Zimmermann, 2016;Scotson et al, 2017, Wearn & Glover-Kapfer, 2017, and PAM (Abrahams, 2018;Browning et al, 2017;Darras et al, 2018). There is also much literature comparing the outcomes of particular methods (e.g., human observation versus camera trapping: Bessone et al, 2020, Cappelle et al, 2019, Greene et al, 2016Joshi et al, 2020, Roberts, 2011. However, few articles compare all three field methods (Stephenson, 2020;Wrege et al, 2017), and none do so in depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, many new field survey projects have been carried out and more data are now available [30]. In particular, new and widely used camera-trapping surveys have provided a large amount of highquality data for snow leopard occurrences e.g., [49,[50][51][52]. Here, we showed that snow leopard occurrence data compiled from published literature, camera-trap surveys, and line transect surveys can be applied using Random Forest to effectively model snow leopard habitats and project the suitable habitats of snow leopards under future climate scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%