1990
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.eng.1990.006.01.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field testing methods for engineering geological investigations

Abstract: Abstract. This paper discusses some of the more commonly used field testing methods used to determine various geotechnical parameters needed to classify soils and rocks in engineering terms and to provide engineering design values. The methods of performing, and the application of, various penetration, shear strength, plate loading, pressuremeter and dilatometer and permeablity tests are described. The use of geophysical methods to obtain, indirectly, mechanical parameter values is also discussed.Field testing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, bearing capacity and compressibility calculations are based on the results of in situ cone standard penetration tests rather than rely on laboratory testing (Bell et al 1990). …”
Section: Boulders Cobbles and Gravelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, bearing capacity and compressibility calculations are based on the results of in situ cone standard penetration tests rather than rely on laboratory testing (Bell et al 1990). …”
Section: Boulders Cobbles and Gravelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases bearing capacity and settlement calculations are based on the results of either laboratory tests on recompacted disturbed samples or in situ standard penetration tests (Bell et al 1990). Clayton et al (1982) described various sophisticated sampling methods but pointed out that since these are expensive and difficult to perform, they are used only in studies in which the structure of the sediment is particularly important, for example in relation to liquefaction potential.…”
Section: Sandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, considering the limitations and deficiencies of laboratory testing and empirical methods, geotechnical engineers have developed many in-situ based techniques to measure more accurately design engineering parameters of soils and rocks. Bell et al (1990) specified that "field testing and, to a lesser extent, geophysical surveying are major sources of both qualitative and quantitative data relating to the ground conditions." Although field testing methods are more expensive in comparison with laboratory testing and also it is not possible to control boundary conditions such as drainage conditions and confining pressure that can be easily provided in laboratory testing, there are several important advantages of field testing.…”
Section: Field Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPT soundings can be very effective in site characterization (Oyedele and Olorode 2010;Coker et al 2013;Coker 2015;Ayolabi et al 2012;Bell et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%