2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field test study on thermal and ventilation performance for natural draft wet cooling tower after structural improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where N wd represents the number of water droplets per unit volume; A wd stands for the surface area of one droplet, m 2 ; the Sc a means the Schmidt number of moist air; Pr a represents the Prandtl number of moist air. In the fill zone, according to fill experiment, K a and K h can be expressed as Equations ( 18) and (19).…”
Section: Heat and Mass Transfer From Water To Airmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where N wd represents the number of water droplets per unit volume; A wd stands for the surface area of one droplet, m 2 ; the Sc a means the Schmidt number of moist air; Pr a represents the Prandtl number of moist air. In the fill zone, according to fill experiment, K a and K h can be expressed as Equations ( 18) and (19).…”
Section: Heat and Mass Transfer From Water To Airmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the MDCT, Guo et al [14] developed a parallel hybrid model to optimize and evaluate the cooling ability of the tower. In past years, the influence of crosswind on the Merkel number [15], water droplet diameter distribution [16], cooling capacity [17], ventilation efficiency [18], and air intake uniformity coefficient [19] of towers have been researched substantially, with research aimed at natural draft cooling towers and not mechanical draft cooling towers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al [6,7] suggested that installing air ducts in the rain area could improve the aerodynamic field of the tower and alleviate the adverse crosswind effect, so as to significantly improve the performance of TWCTs. Structural improvement measures-including adding air deflectors, using non-uniform fillings, and adding air ducts-were also implemented in one large-scale TWCT in order to weaken the adverse influence of crosswind [8]. However, the outlet water temperature of TWCTs remained limited by the inlet air's wet-bulb temperature, which is a major disadvantage, despite many useful methods having been proposed [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that in the range of the tested wind velocities up to 4 m/s, wind negatively affected water cooling by reducing ∆T w by a maximum of 1.75 • C, which constituted a 15% temperature drop. Paper [16] presents the results of repeated tests when air-deflectors were introduced at the air inlet of the cooling tower. Their role was to reduce the effect of wind on the heat exchange process in the cooling tower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%