2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field test of neural-network based automatic bucket-filling algorithm for wheel-loaders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field experiments with a 14-tonne capacity load-haul-dump (LHD) machine and two types of excavation material (rock and gravel) revealed that the algorithm is able to achieve a target bucket fill weight within two to three excavation passes. Compared to AI-based approaches that require many training samples [5] and advanced computing hardware, the proposed controller has practical significance as demonstrated through these field experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field experiments with a 14-tonne capacity load-haul-dump (LHD) machine and two types of excavation material (rock and gravel) revealed that the algorithm is able to achieve a target bucket fill weight within two to three excavation passes. Compared to AI-based approaches that require many training samples [5] and advanced computing hardware, the proposed controller has practical significance as demonstrated through these field experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third category is made up of control algorithms that employ a behavior-based approach for motion control, such as a rule-based algorithm that depends on the current phase and acts dynamically [8], [9]. Thus, most previous solutions to automate the scooping task (1) do not generalize to different machines or pile environments (2) rely on prior knowledge of an expert operator and (3) require accurate models of the machine and therefore are susceptible to failure in the presence of modeling errors, wear and tear, and changing conditions [10]. This underscores the need for a generic automatic scooping solution that can be adapted to different scenarios.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key challenges in deploying automated earth moving machines relates to the analysis of the soil-tool interaction, due to the unpredictable nature of the soil [6]. Most approaches require accurate models of the machine which makes them liable to modeling errors, wear and tear, and changing conditions [10]. Another drawback is that the majority of work done to automate scooping processes is based on data recorded by expert operators, which limits the efficiency to the level of the operator's skills [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fully autonomous solution for robotic excavation must be able to identify and adapt to these variable conditions in order to achieve consistent bucket filling performance. Such a system would have obvious applications in construction [5], military [6], mining [7], and space exploration/development [8] where humans cannot be present for safety, logistical, and/or cost reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%