2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-010-0218-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Survey of the March 28, 2005 Nias-Simeulue Earthquake and Tsunami

Abstract: On the evening of March 28, 2005 at 11:09 p.m. local time (16:09 UTC), a large earthquake occurred offshore of West Sumatra, Indonesia. With a moment magnitude (M w ) of 8.6, the event caused substantial shaking damage and land level changes between Simeulue Island in the north and the Batu Islands in the south. The earthquake also generated a tsunami, which was observed throughout the source region as well as on distant tide gauges. While the tsunami was not as extreme as the tsunami of December 26th, 2004, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, informal real-time warnings transmitted to government authorities in Thailand were not heeded, allegedly on account of their potentially negative impact on the large tourist community. -By contrast, the 2005 Nias earthquake is ranked blue (almost perfect): the response of the population in the near field was exemplary, resulting in only 10 casualties, primarily on account of ancestral tradition among populations south of the 2004 rupture [85,86]. In the far-field, however, the issued warning was overcautious due to tsunami generation in shallow seas and under islands [87].…”
Section: (A) Events From 2004 To 2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, informal real-time warnings transmitted to government authorities in Thailand were not heeded, allegedly on account of their potentially negative impact on the large tourist community. -By contrast, the 2005 Nias earthquake is ranked blue (almost perfect): the response of the population in the near field was exemplary, resulting in only 10 casualties, primarily on account of ancestral tradition among populations south of the 2004 rupture [85,86]. In the far-field, however, the issued warning was overcautious due to tsunami generation in shallow seas and under islands [87].…”
Section: (A) Events From 2004 To 2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epicenter was located in a shallow water region, producing a high-intensity earthquake but a small tsunami. Based on field survey data (BORRERO et al 2011) section, the number of casualties was the largest (as high as 509) (NOAA/NGDC 2014). In fact, this earthquake was considered a ''tsunami earthquake'' that generated a much larger tsunami than expected from the seismic magnitude, insofar as the observed tsunami was 4-7 m high (TOMITA et al 2011;SATAKE et al 2013) and the maximum runup was measured as high as 16.8 m (HILL et al 2012).…”
Section: The 2005 Nias Earthquake and Tsunamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next to the above‐mentioned tsunami runup database from the US National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC), there are additional data available at the website of the UNESCO International Tsunami Information Center (ITIC, http://itic.ioc-unesco.org, last accessed 2011 January) for the two major tsunamis in 2007 and 2010. Furthermore, Borrero et al (2009, 2011) published the results of their post‐tsunami field survey after the 2007 September and the 2005 March event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3 displays the field survey observations after the 2007 Bengkulu event by Borrero et al (2009) and the corresponding tsunami threat assessment at three forecast points in the region [a corresponding figure is provided in the Supporting Information for the 2005 March event with the field survey observations of Borrero et al (2011)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation