2009
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Passeport et al conducted a field study comparing two grassed bioretention cells including IWS zones for 16 months. Significant load reductions were observed for NO 3 and nitrite (NO 2 ) that varied from 47% to 88% in the growing season [53].…”
Section: Hydrologic Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passeport et al conducted a field study comparing two grassed bioretention cells including IWS zones for 16 months. Significant load reductions were observed for NO 3 and nitrite (NO 2 ) that varied from 47% to 88% in the growing season [53].…”
Section: Hydrologic Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioretention cells with sandy subsoils can have exfiltration rates too high for the IWS to remain saturated for more than a few hours. Bioretention cells with subsoils containing more clay have much lower exfiltration rates, leading to prolonged saturated conditions in the IWS, which permits the development of an anaerobic zone where denitrification can take place (Brown and Hunt, 2011b;Passeport et al, 2009).…”
Section: Use Of An Internal Water Storage Layer (Iws) To Promote Denimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High removal rates of both ammonia concentrations and loads have consistently been reported (Dietz and Clausen 2005;Tornes 2005;Hunt et al 2008). Phosphorus removal has been highly inconsistent among studies; ranging from exports to concentration [load] removals to no net removal (Hsieh and Davis 2005;Hunt et al 2006;Li and Davis 2009;Passeport et al 2009). Phosphorus removal has often been correlated with soils having a low P index score because these soils have a greater capacity to adsorb P compared to those with high P index scores (Hunt et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, higher rates of nutrient removal have been found in field studies (Dietz and Clausen 2005;Tornes 2005;Hunt et al 2006;Dietz and Clausen 2008;Passeport et al 2009); however, most of these studies have been conducted in a controlled environment in which synthetic stormwater and/or simulated rain events were applied to the rain gardens. Results from field studies have recently become more available as rain gardens have become more prevalent in the landscape; however, there is still a gap in data concerning long term-effectiveness of rain gardens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%