2002
DOI: 10.1080/00994480.2002.10748390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Study of Luminaire Dirt Depreciation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dirt and dust that settles on lamps and luminaire not only reduce the output but can also change the distribution of a luminaire (Levin 2002 9). An open luminaire without ventilation would have to be cleaned every 12 months to keep the light loss at the same level.…”
Section: Planned Versus Reactive Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dirt and dust that settles on lamps and luminaire not only reduce the output but can also change the distribution of a luminaire (Levin 2002 9). An open luminaire without ventilation would have to be cleaned every 12 months to keep the light loss at the same level.…”
Section: Planned Versus Reactive Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dirt and dust that settles on lamps and luminaire not only reduce the output but can also change the distribution of a luminaire (Levin 2002 ). An open luminaire without ventilation would have to be cleaned every 12 months to keep the light loss at the same level.…”
Section: Planned Versus Reactive Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, current design practices may overestimate the light losses due to dirt accumulation, resulting in greater energy use than necessary for lighting systems in newer buildings. Levin (2002) reported the methods and results of a study in which the fluorescent lighting systems in 197 different facilities were monitored over a three-year period. Figure 2 (Levin 2002) compares the results of this study to the previously published IESNA LDD curves, and shows that the actual light loss due to dirt depreciation was much less than the IESNA estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%