2019
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field‐scale well leakage risk assessment using reduced‐order models

Abstract: Oil wells that intersect a potential CO2 storage zone in a depleted oil and gas field may provide leakage pathways. It is essential to estimate the field‐scale leakage risk associated with these wells. In this study, a risk‐based approach is used to estimate the risk of leakage. Existing reduced‐order models for well leakage are used to quantitatively estimate well leakage rates for cased‐cemented, cased‐uncemented, and open wellbores. For each existing well that intersects the storage zone, we introduce the w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
(182 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, SCP reports are scarce and are available for recently drilled wells where they are mandated by regulations. Other approaches include using Cement Bond Logs (CBLs) or cement coverage in the annulus as indicators of well integrity [42][43][44]. While some studies focus on currently producing or recently drilled wells, the highest-risk wells are those pre-dating standardized procedures and lacking SCP reports, CBL data, and cementing or casing details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SCP reports are scarce and are available for recently drilled wells where they are mandated by regulations. Other approaches include using Cement Bond Logs (CBLs) or cement coverage in the annulus as indicators of well integrity [42][43][44]. While some studies focus on currently producing or recently drilled wells, the highest-risk wells are those pre-dating standardized procedures and lacking SCP reports, CBL data, and cementing or casing details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%