2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2008.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field preservation of monogenean parasites for molecular and morphological analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study of free-living nematodes and some parasites of invertebrates, Yoder et al (2006) reported successful PCR amplification of nuclear ribosomal gene regions of up to 1,800 bp in ,80% of the specimens tested (Yoder et al, 2006). DESS has also been tested for preservation of monogeneans and fish gill tissues, and the results confirmed excellent, short-term preservation (up to 8 wk tested experimentally, with longer preservation periods suggested) of parasites and gills, with PCR amplification and DNA sequencing results comparable to 99% ethanol (Strona et al, 2009). In other studies, PCR-based evaluations of 5 solutions used for field preservation of DNA for marine invertebrate tissues (NaCl-CTAB, 70% ethanol, DESS, Queen's lysis buffer, and urea buffer) also indicated that DESS was best for preserving both the physical structure of tissues and the DNA, as assessed by amplification (Dawson et al, 1998), a result previously reported for vertebrate tissues (Seutin et al, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In their study of free-living nematodes and some parasites of invertebrates, Yoder et al (2006) reported successful PCR amplification of nuclear ribosomal gene regions of up to 1,800 bp in ,80% of the specimens tested (Yoder et al, 2006). DESS has also been tested for preservation of monogeneans and fish gill tissues, and the results confirmed excellent, short-term preservation (up to 8 wk tested experimentally, with longer preservation periods suggested) of parasites and gills, with PCR amplification and DNA sequencing results comparable to 99% ethanol (Strona et al, 2009). In other studies, PCR-based evaluations of 5 solutions used for field preservation of DNA for marine invertebrate tissues (NaCl-CTAB, 70% ethanol, DESS, Queen's lysis buffer, and urea buffer) also indicated that DESS was best for preserving both the physical structure of tissues and the DNA, as assessed by amplification (Dawson et al, 1998), a result previously reported for vertebrate tissues (Seutin et al, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The emergence of molecular methods has prompted a renewed interest in methods which can process material for both morphological and molecular methods (Harris et al 1999;Košková et al 2011;Naem et al 2010;Strona et al 2009;Toe et al 1997;Yoder et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a good fixative for both molecular and morphological studies, apart from alcohol, fixation used DMSO-NaCl solution by Strona et al 2009; however, morphological and molecular analyses were conducted separately on different individual of parasites. Other fixatives commonly used for monogeneans such as formalin and alcohol-formalin-acetic acid act as fine preservatives for morphological investigation of parasites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these difficulties, the classical morphological determination has been combined with modern molecular approaches, especially utilizing variability of the internal transcribed spacers and genes of ribosomal DNA (Dzikowksi et al 2003;Huyse et al 2004;Matejusová et al 2001Matejusová et al , 2002Matejusová et al , 2004Shamsi et al 2009;Strona et al 2009). Molecular analyses complementing morphological taxonomy help to assign correct molecular data with an appropriate species to ensure its accurate determination and description (Harris et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%