2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-omics—understanding large-scale molecular data from field crops

Abstract: The recent advances in gene expression analysis as well as protein and metabolite quantification enable genome-scale capturing of complex biological processes at the molecular level in crop field trials. This opens up new possibilities for understanding the molecular and environmental complexity of field-based systems and thus shedding light on the black box between genotype and environment, which in agriculture always is influenced by a multi-stress environment and includes management interventions. Neverthel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely due to the progressive nature of field stress treatments and needs to be considered as a general trend under field conditions. In contrast to the phenotypic and transcriptomic profiles monitored in previous studies (Witt et al, 2012;Alexandersson et al, 2014), some typical stress responses of primary metabolism in field-grown plants are fairly similar to those of greenhouse-grown plants and seem well conserved between growth conditions and even among species. This robustness of metabolic change renders it a good candidate for marker-assisted breeding.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is likely due to the progressive nature of field stress treatments and needs to be considered as a general trend under field conditions. In contrast to the phenotypic and transcriptomic profiles monitored in previous studies (Witt et al, 2012;Alexandersson et al, 2014), some typical stress responses of primary metabolism in field-grown plants are fairly similar to those of greenhouse-grown plants and seem well conserved between growth conditions and even among species. This robustness of metabolic change renders it a good candidate for marker-assisted breeding.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…HS was applied by altering the planting date to ensure that the reproductive phase coincided with high temperatures (Craufurd et al, 2013). Despite limitations in fine climate control, large-scale field trials are still valuable, since it is often reported that important agronomical traits are masked in greenhouse-grown crops (Alexandersson et al, 2014). In our previous study in controlled greenhouse conditions, genotypes chosen to cover a wide range of DS tolerance based on field results did not display differential effects of DS on physiological traits (Witt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ds Responses In Field and Greenhouse Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is a key issue in a field setting, which represents a multi-stress environment with many classes of pathogens and pests, as exemplified by the established distinction between biotrophs inducing SA-related pathways and necrotrophs and insect herbivores inducing mainly JA/ET-related pathways. In general, there is a need to move molecular studies from laboratory to field settings and also try to incorporate as much knowledge as possible from model species into crops [158]. For example, in a field experiment by Thaler et al [36] tomato plants treated with BTH exhibited reduced symptoms of bacterial speck caused by P. syringae compared to non-treated plants.…”
Section: Induced Resistance In Field and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw data from the omic experiments need to be analysed and converted into figures, models, and other visual representations to be shared among the scientific community. The holistic measurement of the phenotype of a crop plant such as maize or rice is the main objective of agricultural phenomics, also called field-omics [13]. Currently, yield and phenotypic data obtained by public breeding institutions such as Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo (CIMMYT) and the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) are mostly provided as numbers within large tables in spreadsheet format.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%