2020
DOI: 10.3906/elk-2004-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-of-view optimization of magnetically actuated 2D gimballed scanners

Abstract: This work presents the field of view (FOV) maximization of a magnetically actuated two-dimensional (2D) gimballed scanner. The process of maximization is completed in two steps. (1) Optimization of the electrocoil providing the magnetic force that moves the scanner and (2) precise choice of optimum respective locations of both the scanner and the electrocoil. We first derived a formula relating the generated magnetic flux density, coil design parameters and driving voltage. Subsequently, we discussed the desig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the aforementioned analytical solutions are unobtainable, suitable numerical procedures have to be selected, and it becomes imperative to evidence the pros and cons of each method [ 25 , 26 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. MEMS is a rampant technology employed for realizing thermo-elastic systems [ 1 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ], and it has a wide variety of applications ranging from biomedical engineering to microfluidics [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Moreover, many researchers are actively engaged in the development of important experimental research works for the development and prototyping of special MEMS such as, for example, circular graphene membrane MEMS devices [ 43 , 44 ], SiN circular membrane MEMS devices [ 45 , 46 ], and CMOS MEMS-based membrane-bridge devices [ 47 ] particularly useful for industrial applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the aforementioned analytical solutions are unobtainable, suitable numerical procedures have to be selected, and it becomes imperative to evidence the pros and cons of each method [ 25 , 26 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. MEMS is a rampant technology employed for realizing thermo-elastic systems [ 1 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ], and it has a wide variety of applications ranging from biomedical engineering to microfluidics [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Moreover, many researchers are actively engaged in the development of important experimental research works for the development and prototyping of special MEMS such as, for example, circular graphene membrane MEMS devices [ 43 , 44 ], SiN circular membrane MEMS devices [ 45 , 46 ], and CMOS MEMS-based membrane-bridge devices [ 47 ] particularly useful for industrial applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%