2013
DOI: 10.1080/1600910x.2013.838976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field notes: ethnographic writing reconsidered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The writing in question can only become an academic product if the researcher renders the observations intersubjectively accessible. However, this rendering process is one of the main challenges of ethnographic work, as scholars like Emerson et al (2011), Hirschauer (2006), or Kalthoff (2013) have shown. Although an iterative quality is widely regarded as one of the main characteristics of qualitative research designs, introductory works on writing—for the sake of clarity—mostly describe it rather like a linear process, from jottings to field notes to publications.…”
Section: Ethnographic Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The writing in question can only become an academic product if the researcher renders the observations intersubjectively accessible. However, this rendering process is one of the main challenges of ethnographic work, as scholars like Emerson et al (2011), Hirschauer (2006), or Kalthoff (2013) have shown. Although an iterative quality is widely regarded as one of the main characteristics of qualitative research designs, introductory works on writing—for the sake of clarity—mostly describe it rather like a linear process, from jottings to field notes to publications.…”
Section: Ethnographic Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this dialogue, two selves of the concrete ethnographer individual interact, namely the observing-ethnographer-in-the-field and the ethnographer-in-the-field-notes. (Kalthoff 2013, 273)…”
Section: Ethnographic Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, epistemic practices also rely on technical instruments, spatial architectures, and material arrangements that are taken for granted and therefore are ignored in research reports and publications (e. g., Knorr Cetina 1981; Latour 1987; Latour and Woolgar 1986). While the focus of STS was initially limited to the natural sciences, more recent research has begun to investigate the social sciences (Law 2004; Law and Urry 2004) including qualitative and ethnographic methods (Engert and Krey 2013; Kalthoff 2013; Liegl and Wagner 2013; Schindler and Schäfer 2020; Tutt and Hindmarsh 2011). In applying insights from STS, these studies have offered analyses of the materiality of ethnographic knowledge production, focusing particularly on fieldnotes and on writing practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schindler and Schäfer (2020), for instance, show how writing practices in ethnographic research are simultaneously cognitive, embodied, and material. In reconsidering field notes, Kalthoff (2013) investigates how the material organization of field notes actively contributes to the perception of what has been written down. At the same time, the involvement of material things like note pads in making ethnographic methods present and open for participants has hardly been addressed from this perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation