2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7878(05)80008-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field meeting: Romney Marsh — its churches and geology, 22 May 2004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent examination by the author of all customarily recognized Anglo-Saxon churches in England (Potter 2005b), confirmed an earlier hypothesis that pre-Conquest church builders in ashlar stone used the stone for certain structural features in unusual and specific styles (Potter 2003;2005a). Their techniques of stone emplacement prove sufficiently distinctive for their craftsmanship to be distinguishable from the work of others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent examination by the author of all customarily recognized Anglo-Saxon churches in England (Potter 2005b), confirmed an earlier hypothesis that pre-Conquest church builders in ashlar stone used the stone for certain structural features in unusual and specific styles (Potter 2003;2005a). Their techniques of stone emplacement prove sufficiently distinctive for their craftsmanship to be distinguishable from the work of others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Furthermore, the degrees to which the stone in the wall fabric was worked (in post-Roman times) in England give a good indication of any particular wall's age (Potter 1998). Whole or broken, large, marine beach cobbles incorporated into a wall provide a fairly reliable indication of Anglo-Saxon workmanship (eg Pearson & Potter 2002;Potter 2005a). In general, the same rules appear to apply in Scotland.…”
Section: Churches Of Pre-conquest Originmentioning
confidence: 98%