2009
DOI: 10.3390/s100100266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Map Reconstruction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Bayesian Estimation

Abstract: Field inhomogeneities in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can cause blur or image distortion as they produce off-resonance frequency at each voxel. These effects can be corrected if an accurate field map is available. Field maps can be estimated starting from the phase of multiple complex MRI data sets. In this paper we present a technique based on statistical estimation in order to reconstruct a field map exploiting two or more scans. The proposed approach implements a Bayesian estimator in conjunction with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acquisition model reported in Equation (1), which is a solution to Bloch equations, assuming that T E is short with respect to T R , is related to the noise-free case and does not take into account the dependency on the static magnetic field, B . Considering noise, in the complex domain, the model becomes: y=yR+iyI=f(θ)exp(iϕ)+(nR+inI)where n R and n I are the real and imaginary parts of the noise samples, which are distributed as independent circularly Gaussian variables [22], and ϕ represents the angle of the complex data [23,24]. Thus, the statistical distributions of the real and imaginary parts of the acquired signal are: fYR(yR)=12πσ2exp((yRf(θ)cos(ϕ))22σ2) fYI(yI)=12πσ2exp0.2em((yIffalse(bold-italicθfalse)sinfalse(ϕfalse))22σ2)where σ 2 is the variance of real and imaginary noise components.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquisition model reported in Equation (1), which is a solution to Bloch equations, assuming that T E is short with respect to T R , is related to the noise-free case and does not take into account the dependency on the static magnetic field, B . Considering noise, in the complex domain, the model becomes: y=yR+iyI=f(θ)exp(iϕ)+(nR+inI)where n R and n I are the real and imaginary parts of the noise samples, which are distributed as independent circularly Gaussian variables [22], and ϕ represents the angle of the complex data [23,24]. Thus, the statistical distributions of the real and imaginary parts of the acquired signal are: fYR(yR)=12πσ2exp((yRf(θ)cos(ϕ))22σ2) fYI(yI)=12πσ2exp0.2em((yIffalse(bold-italicθfalse)sinfalse(ϕfalse))22σ2)where σ 2 is the variance of real and imaginary noise components.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the application of inverse 2D Fourier transform, the image in the space domain is formed. 7,8 Let us consider a Spin Echo (SE) imaging sequence. In a noise free case, the amplitude of the recorded signal g related to a single voxel can be written as: 9…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquisition model reported in ( 1 ) is related to the noise-free case. Considering noise, in the complex domain the model becomes where n R and n I are the real and imaginary parts of the noise samples, which are distributed as independent circularly Gaussian variables [ 12 ], and ϕ represents the angle of the complex data [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%