2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2021.120667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-induced single-ion magnet behaviors in 1-dimensionally assembled tetrahedral cobalt(II) complexes with halide donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selected bond lengths and bond angles of 1 are given in Table S3 †. The Co(1)–N distances (2.001(1) and 2.008(2) Å) and the Co(1)–I distances (2.5946(2) and 2.5742(2) Å) are similar to the values obtained for tetrahedral cobalt( ii ) complexes with an N 2 I 2 coordination environment, 7 Table S1 †. The tetrahedral bond angles vary from 102.75(4) to 115.48(4)°.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Selected bond lengths and bond angles of 1 are given in Table S3 †. The Co(1)–N distances (2.001(1) and 2.008(2) Å) and the Co(1)–I distances (2.5946(2) and 2.5742(2) Å) are similar to the values obtained for tetrahedral cobalt( ii ) complexes with an N 2 I 2 coordination environment, 7 Table S1 †. The tetrahedral bond angles vary from 102.75(4) to 115.48(4)°.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The zero field splitting (ZFS) parameter D describing the axial magnetic anisotropy is determined by the strength of the spin–orbit interaction and also by the ligand field around the Co ion, and so the D parameter may change in a wide range depending on the ligand environment. 1–3 Among different Co( ii ) complexes showing SIM behavior one can mention octahedral and quasi-octahedral Co( ii ) complexes, 2,4 linear complexes such as [(NHC)CoNDmp] and [Co(C(SiMe 2 ONaph) 3 ) 2 ] exhibiting the highest values of the magnetization reversal barrier ( U eff = 413 cm −1 and 450 cm −1 , respectively), 5 tetrahedral (or quasi-tetrahedral) complexes in which the D value varies from +20 cm −1 to −160 cm −1 depending on the ligand field symmetry and strength, 2,6,7 and trigonal prismatic complexes. 2,8 It is worth noting that octahedral, tetrahedral and trigonal prismatic complexes are stable, and from this point of view they are more attractive for practical use than the linear ones despite the fact that the latter complexes exhibit higher magnetic anisotropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation