2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41477-019-0467-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-grown tobacco plants maintain robust growth while accumulating large quantities of a bacterial cellulase in chloroplasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, culturing microalgae in non-axenic conditions, by phosphite selective nutrition, may significantly reduce the current cost of algal biomass production. The combined use of (i) PTXD together with (ii) a cheaper growth medium (i.e.T10APhi medium) and (iii) a low-light demand for optimal CWDEexpression (50-100 µE, Figure 2b-c) can reduce production cost of PBR-grown microalgae to 3.2-3.8 € kg/DW as argued by Tredici et al (2016) and Slade and Bauen (2013), a value close to that reported for field-grown tobacco plants (2 € kg/DW; Maksymowicz, and Palmer 1997;Schmidt et al 2019). Similarly, transgenic tobacco production is low cost in open field and under optimal conditions, which unfortunately could only be achieved in countries with no restriction on GMO cultivation, while production cost is significantly higher for greenhouse-grown plants (6 € kg/DW; Fa e et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, culturing microalgae in non-axenic conditions, by phosphite selective nutrition, may significantly reduce the current cost of algal biomass production. The combined use of (i) PTXD together with (ii) a cheaper growth medium (i.e.T10APhi medium) and (iii) a low-light demand for optimal CWDEexpression (50-100 µE, Figure 2b-c) can reduce production cost of PBR-grown microalgae to 3.2-3.8 € kg/DW as argued by Tredici et al (2016) and Slade and Bauen (2013), a value close to that reported for field-grown tobacco plants (2 € kg/DW; Maksymowicz, and Palmer 1997;Schmidt et al 2019). Similarly, transgenic tobacco production is low cost in open field and under optimal conditions, which unfortunately could only be achieved in countries with no restriction on GMO cultivation, while production cost is significantly higher for greenhouse-grown plants (6 € kg/DW; Fa e et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Compartmentalized expression of CWDEs in the chloroplast may enhance the yield of recombinant protein since chloroplast expression is not prone to gene silencing (Li et al 2019); nevertheless, the use of endogenous promoters and other cis-acting elements to drive chloroplast expression of transgenes may be subjected to the host regulation, requiring the optimization of specific growth conditions in order to enhance recombinant protein yield (Fields et al 2018, Figure 2). Transplastomic tobacco plants that accumulate high level of GH5, GH6 and GH9 endoglucanases and pectin lyases have been reported (Fa e et al 2017;Schmidt et al 2019;Verma et al 2010). Moreover, transplastomic tobacco plants expressing the GH3 b-glucosidase Bgl1 from Trichoderma reesei had an increased biomass yield and an improved resistance towards aphids than wild-type plants (Jin et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study with plastidengineered tobacco plants further demonstrated the viability of plant-based protein production in a field setting. The results showed that field-grown tobacco expressing a recombinant protein were capable of achieving an order of magnitude reduction in costs compared to traditional cell culture methods [44]. In addition, as the glycosylation state of antibody therapeutics is crucial for their function [45,46], plants are uniquely suited to produce RIC vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these systems are often expensive to establish, labor-intensive to maintain, prone to contamination, and inflexible to changing market demands [2]. With wellestablished cultivation practices, a genetically engineered (GE) biomass crop, like tobacco, may represent a lowcost alternative [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%