4], let us first of all specify its topic. A term "geoengineering" which came to us from the English-language literature embraces a wide range of various techniques of climate warming prevention. In order to preclude a potential confusion, in the report [7], for example, it is proposed to divide all kinds of climate regulation into two classes: techniques directed at the direct removal of CO 2 from the atmosphere and techniques of the solar radiation control for the purpose of decreasing its absorption by the Earth's surface. Recent investigations demonstrated that the use of technique of the second class is able to bring a large-scale damage to the environment and economic development of certain regions of the globe. These are the deliberate aerosol scattering in the stratosphere to control the solar radiation coming to the Earth's surface and problems associated with this technique were discussed in our paper. Thus, the author of [5] substitutes the discussion of stratospheric aerosol scattering by the discussion of the great variety of techniques embraced usually by the general term "geoengineering" which we did not deal with. By the way, the authors avoided this term in [4] concentrating on the concrete technique.Ryaboshapko asserts, "the authors' position against this background seems to be an appeal to taboo the research in this field (at least, in Russia)" [5]. It would be strange to talk about the taboo on researching carried out by the authors themselves (for example, see [3,6]). It should be noted that the study of environmental response to the deliberate interference can be carried out within the frameworks of two considerably differing approaches. The first approach deals with the investigations based on the model computations using the physical and mathematical climatic models. Such researches are carried out in a number of the Russian scientific organizations (including our institute) and abroad. Physical and mathematical modeling enables to estimate the consequences of the climate control without the risk of bringing any damage to the environment.The second approach consists in carrying out the field experiments within the frameworks of which a direct interference with the environment (atmosphere) of the regional and global scales takes place. In [4], one of the well-known experiments of such kind is mentioned [1]: "…in Russia, field experiments on aerosol scattering are started. In this connection, a question arises how significant can be the results obtained in the local and regional field experiments for climate generalizations of a global scale, and, first and foremost, for estimates of consequences of interference with climate and biosphere. The scientific value of such 566