2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3329-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field evaluation of seasonal trends in relative population sizes and dispersal pattern of Aedes albopictus males in support of the design of a sterile male release strategy

Abstract: BackgroundTo develop an efficient sterile insect technique (SIT) programme, the number of sterile males to release, along with the spatial and temporal pattern of their release, has to be determined. Such parameters could be estimated from a reliable estimation of the wild population density (and its temporal variation) in the area to treat. Here, a series of mark-release-recapture experiments using laboratory-reared and field-derived Aedes albopictus males were carried out in Duparc, a selected pilot site for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study also supports the recommendation from investigations into the use of the SIT that more sterile males be introduced into an area to outcompete non-sterile males [32]. This study has demonstrated that even under optimum conditions fewer males than females are produced and hence the release of a large number of sterile males would dilute the in uence of the smaller number of males reared in the wild [33]. However, according to Maharaj [26], there is a slight variation in sex ratio across seasons requiring that SIT programmes constantly monitor of wild versus sterile males to adjust the release rate over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The study also supports the recommendation from investigations into the use of the SIT that more sterile males be introduced into an area to outcompete non-sterile males [32]. This study has demonstrated that even under optimum conditions fewer males than females are produced and hence the release of a large number of sterile males would dilute the in uence of the smaller number of males reared in the wild [33]. However, according to Maharaj [26], there is a slight variation in sex ratio across seasons requiring that SIT programmes constantly monitor of wild versus sterile males to adjust the release rate over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The study also supports the recommendation from investigations into the use of the sterile insect technique (SIT) that more sterile males be introduced into an area to outcompete non-sterile males [32]. This study has demonstrated that even under optimum conditions fewer males than females are produced and hence the release of a large number of sterile males would dilute the competition from the smaller number of males produced in the wild [33]. Furthermore, male control can be achieved by baits and swarm space spraying [34] However, according to Maharaj [26], there is a slight variation in sex ratio across seasons requiring that SIT programmes constantly monitor the wild male population to adjust the release rate over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This later estimate is similar to the carrying capacity of our study ( F = 3283.9)—thus our ecological assumptions are coherent with known hot-spots in Italy. On Reunion Island, densities of over 5800 males/ha have been reported using mark-release-recapture with mice-baited BG-Sentinel traps 74 —our modelling predicts that, if using SIT alone, it would be very difficult to bring R 0 below one with such high mosquito densities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%