1995
DOI: 10.1093/jee/88.1.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Evaluation of Pheromone-Baited Traps for Coniesta ignefusalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Niger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Synthetic pheromone blends for Chilo suppressalis, C. sacchariphagus, Chilo indicus, Chilo auricilius and C. zacconius have shown satisfactory attractiveness to male moths in the field (25). Sex pheromones for B. fusca, C. partellus, S. calamistis, S. cretica, S. nonagrioides and C. ignefusalis have been identified and are available commercially (195,225).…”
Section: Management Utilization Of Synthetic Sex Pheromonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic pheromone blends for Chilo suppressalis, C. sacchariphagus, Chilo indicus, Chilo auricilius and C. zacconius have shown satisfactory attractiveness to male moths in the field (25). Sex pheromones for B. fusca, C. partellus, S. calamistis, S. cretica, S. nonagrioides and C. ignefusalis have been identified and are available commercially (195,225).…”
Section: Management Utilization Of Synthetic Sex Pheromonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two light traps and five pheromone-baited traps similar to those described by , and Youm and Beevor (1995), were used at ICRISAT Sahelian Centre (ISC) station. Light traps consisted of a 250 W mercury-vapour bulb mounted on top of a 3 x 3 x 3 m screen cage with a door on one side to access and collect trapped moths.…”
Section: Trap Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Teixeira et al (2008) evaluated the capture of M. domestica with traps installed at 1.00 m of height from the ground, due to the flight height of these flies. However, other studies assessing the best height for insect traps found no effect of this factor (MELO, 2011;YOUM, 1995). The authors of these studies, regardless of the effect of trap height, presented several hypotheses for these results, such as insect flight height, physical barriers by leaves and stems, and the effect of height in the attraction method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%