1962
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-196209000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Evaluation of Human Anthrax Vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
180
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
180
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Brachman paper, 21 cases of cutaneous anthrax were observed (15 among placebo recipients, 3 in the observational group, and 3 who received anthrax vaccine). Of the three cases of cutaneous anthrax among partially vaccinated subjects, none had received the 6-month dose of anthrax vaccine [23]. One case occurred 5 months after third dose, but before the first of three 6-month boosters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the Brachman paper, 21 cases of cutaneous anthrax were observed (15 among placebo recipients, 3 in the observational group, and 3 who received anthrax vaccine). Of the three cases of cutaneous anthrax among partially vaccinated subjects, none had received the 6-month dose of anthrax vaccine [23]. One case occurred 5 months after third dose, but before the first of three 6-month boosters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…No cases of anthrax disease have been observed among individuals receiving the 6-month dose of AVA [23,24]. In the Brachman paper, 21 cases of cutaneous anthrax were observed (15 among placebo recipients, 3 in the observational group, and 3 who received anthrax vaccine).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because knowledge of the protection afforded by anthrax vaccines is limited [26] by reason of ethical constraints in evaluating efficacy in humans directly, surrogates are required as a means to predict human efficacy. Thus, the potency test selected should be such that it could function as a surrogate to predict the efficacy of the product in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 This vaccine is highly protective against inhalational B. anthracis spore challenge in rabbits and monkeys. 5 A similar vaccine had 92.5% efficacy against clinical anthrax among workers in New England wool mills in the middle of the last century, 6 but no other human efficacy trials have ever been performed. The vaccine has been recommended pre-exposure for members of the U.S. Armed Forces, for some laboratory workers, and for others who may be occupationally exposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%