1962
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.52.4.632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Evaluation of a Human Anthrax Vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that at doses as high as the TD(50), Ͼ4 months of antibiotic prophylaxis may be necessary to reduce risk adequately to Ͻ1͞10,000, and it is likely considerable morbidity would occur before antibiotic prophylaxis could even be initiated. The use of anthrax vaccine as a postexposure prophylaxis that can confer long-term immunity could shorten the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, but limited data on its postexposure efficacy exist (3,24). At doses lower than the TD(1), antibiotic prophylaxis of 60-day duration should be adequate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate that at doses as high as the TD(50), Ͼ4 months of antibiotic prophylaxis may be necessary to reduce risk adequately to Ͻ1͞10,000, and it is likely considerable morbidity would occur before antibiotic prophylaxis could even be initiated. The use of anthrax vaccine as a postexposure prophylaxis that can confer long-term immunity could shorten the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, but limited data on its postexposure efficacy exist (3,24). At doses lower than the TD(1), antibiotic prophylaxis of 60-day duration should be adequate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current anthrax vaccines are believed to provide protection by eliciting anthrax toxin-neutralizing PA antibodies (52). While PA-specific antibodies appear to be the primary source of protection, many animal studies have shown that inclusion of additional antigens, including EF, into PA-based vaccines results in increased levels of protection (33,53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental group was vaccinated against anthrax, whereas the control group received a placebo. Several months after the study began an outbreak of inhalational anthrax occurred, and because the vaccination proved to be effective, all workers were vaccinated and the experiment was terminated (2,7).…”
Section: Historical and Current Biological Outbreaksmentioning
confidence: 99%