2005
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2005.9517327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field estimation of daily ration of Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in the south of Portugal

Abstract: Daily ration estimates of Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) from field samplings over a 24-h cycle were obtained. Four tows were conducted in the middle continental slope, off the south coast of Portugal. The results from Eggers (1977Eggers ( , 1979 and Elliot & Persson (1978) daily ration models were compared, by the Worobec 8-method (1984), showing no significant differences among them. The estimates of food consumption obtained varied from 1.098 to 1.170 g dry food per 100 g body wet weight in males and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of these feeding patterns did not report differences based on the sex or size of animals (Aguzzi et al 2007). Recently, similar conclusions were also obtained for a deeper water population of the middle slope (600 m) off Portugal (Cristo and Castro 2005).…”
Section: The Feeding Rhythmicitysupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of these feeding patterns did not report differences based on the sex or size of animals (Aguzzi et al 2007). Recently, similar conclusions were also obtained for a deeper water population of the middle slope (600 m) off Portugal (Cristo and Castro 2005).…”
Section: The Feeding Rhythmicitysupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Oakley 1979;Aguzzi et al 2004g;Cristo and Castro 2005). Although there are no quantified observations on the behavior of food collection during the emergence, but only the presumption that animals chiefly leave their burrows on a daily basis in order to forage (Oakley 1979), we proposed what follows.…”
Section: The Comparison Of Field and Laboratory Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2006). It must be pointed out that our values are computed from only one survey; the low number of collected specimens was not sufficient to estimate the food consumption for all the four periods studied, which need subsequent studies, as daily ration may vary greatly with season (Maynou & Cartes 1998; Cristo & Castro 2005; Carpentieri et al. 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring scope for growth suffers from methodological constraints including accurately calculating metabolic rates and dealing with high individual variability. Again, in this case, more research is required to explore whether different rhythms in feeding and digestive activity perhaps cancel out habitat-specific foraging patterns (Cristo and Castro, 2005). Aguzzi et al, 2003), even if habitat-specific emergence patterns do not necessarily translate into differences in stomach fullness (Aguzzi et al, 2004).…”
Section: Factors That Suppress Sizementioning
confidence: 99%