2002
DOI: 10.1002/pssc.200390090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Emission from Polycrystalline GaN Grown on Mo Substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The turn-on field obtained from the J-E curve shown in Figure 4 is estimated to 5.1 V/µm, lower than the previously reported turn-on fields of ∼6.1 or 12 V/µm for undoped GaN nanowires and that of ∼6.4 V/µm for polycrystalline bulk GaN. [20][21][22] Compared to the undoped GaN nanowires reported previously, 19 the P-doped GaN nanowires have larger diameters. Our intensive experiments also indicated that there is little difference in the film thickness and density for the doped/undoped GaN films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The turn-on field obtained from the J-E curve shown in Figure 4 is estimated to 5.1 V/µm, lower than the previously reported turn-on fields of ∼6.1 or 12 V/µm for undoped GaN nanowires and that of ∼6.4 V/µm for polycrystalline bulk GaN. [20][21][22] Compared to the undoped GaN nanowires reported previously, 19 the P-doped GaN nanowires have larger diameters. Our intensive experiments also indicated that there is little difference in the film thickness and density for the doped/undoped GaN films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…For the polycrystalline GaN grown on Mo substrates, the field enhancement factor ␥ was 210. 13 Clearly, the GaN nanorod sample exhibits a much larger ␥ value because of the geometrical configurations of sharp tip-like structures on top of nanorods observed in the XTEM image. The field enhancement factor of 1270 for the GaN nanorod sample is somewhat smaller than those of CNTs ͑1000-50 000͒, 1,2 tetrapot-like ZnO nanostructures ͑6285͒, 3 and ZnO nanofibers ͑2991͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[9][10][11][12] To date, we have reported that the polycrystalline GaN grown on Mo substrates by molecular beam epitaxy ͑MBE͒ exhibits good field emission characteristics because of both low electron affinity and their grain structures. 13,14 Compared with CNT-and ZnO-based nanostructures, the field enhancement factor was lower and the resultant turn-on electric field was higher. We also reported the MBE growth of polycrystalline GaN columns on quartz glass substrate with their c axis perpendicular to the substrate surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, GaN powders themselves could be used as high quality phosphors. GaN has low electron affinity of 2.7-3.3 eV compared to carbon nanotubes (CNTs), zinc oxide (ZnO) which is 4.5 eV and Si, hence GaN is used for field emission devices [3][4][5]. Reports on the field emission characteristics of GaN nanowires have already revealed a high emission current density and a long emitter life time [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%