2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field emission enhancement of ZnO nanorod arrays with hafnium nitride coating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7][8] The two kinds of ZnO-NAs have the similar geometrical shape, so they have similar enhancement factors. [18][19] And then the similar enhancement factors reconfirm that the two ZnO-NAs have the same emitter morphology. Furthermore, the CCD camera can not observe any light emission from the surface of ZnO-NAs during the emission process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] The two kinds of ZnO-NAs have the similar geometrical shape, so they have similar enhancement factors. [18][19] And then the similar enhancement factors reconfirm that the two ZnO-NAs have the same emitter morphology. Furthermore, the CCD camera can not observe any light emission from the surface of ZnO-NAs during the emission process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…They attributed it to both the improvement of β and the reduction of work function. L. Yuan et al [ 94 ] synthesized the HfN x coated ZnO nanorods by using different N 2 flow ratio (denoted as f N2 in Figure 23 c). They found that the Hf 3 N 2 coated sample synthesized by using f N2 of 0.05 has a lower turn-on field which was attributed to its low work function of 1.36 eV.…”
Section: Field Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( c ) Results for ZnO nanorods and HfN x coated ZnO nanorods. Reproduced from [ 94 ], with the permission of Elsevier, 2008. ( d ) Results for bare and different thickness LaB 6 coated ZnO nanowires.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] In particular, one-dimensional (1D) ZnO nanostructures, such as nanorods and nanowires, have been considered as candidates for eld emission (FE) cathode materials [6][7][8][9][10] because of the ease with which their morphology, dimensions and even spatial arrangement can be controlled, as well as because of their high thermal stability and oxidation resistance in harsh environments. 11 However, compared with bulk materials, 1D nanostructured materials are relatively unstable and can be easily deformed during operation, especially under large current and high power density conditions. 12 The operating voltages of the as-prepared ZnO for FE are generally high because of relatively high electron affinity ($4.5 eV) 13 and large work function ($5.3 eV), 14 which may limit its practical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%