1992
DOI: 10.1136/vr.131.4.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field efficacy of flumethrin pour-on against Psoroptes ovis in cattle

Abstract: The field efficacy of pour-on formulation of flumethrin 1 per cent was assessed in cattle naturally infested with Psoroptes ovis. In a finishing unit, 18 infested animals were selected, left untreated for one month and examined twice to monitor the progress of the infestation. They were treated twice 10 days apart with a pour-on formulation of flumethrin 1 per cent (2 mg/kg bodyweight). Skin samples were collected from the animals on days 0, 7, 14, 28 and 42 and examined for the presence of live mites. The cli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SLICE ® treatments on Atlantic salmon grow‐out sites in Maine are only administered after clear demonstration of natural infestation (prophylactic marine treatments are not allowed under the current INAD); and because lice counts are performed frequently, the degree of natural challenge can be estimated by parasite loads pretreatment. Consequently, the use of an alternative method that calculates efficacy as a proportional‐reduction relative to baseline infestation in the same population (Abbott 1925; Losson & Lonneux 1992; Ramstad, Colquhoun, Nordmo, Sutherland & Simmons 2002), rather than an untreated control group, is unlikely to lead to serious bias. We demonstrate the feasibility of efficacy evaluation in the absence of untreated controls using field data from Atlantic salmon farmed in the Cobscook Bay region of Maine and treated with SLICE ® during the years 2002–2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLICE ® treatments on Atlantic salmon grow‐out sites in Maine are only administered after clear demonstration of natural infestation (prophylactic marine treatments are not allowed under the current INAD); and because lice counts are performed frequently, the degree of natural challenge can be estimated by parasite loads pretreatment. Consequently, the use of an alternative method that calculates efficacy as a proportional‐reduction relative to baseline infestation in the same population (Abbott 1925; Losson & Lonneux 1992; Ramstad, Colquhoun, Nordmo, Sutherland & Simmons 2002), rather than an untreated control group, is unlikely to lead to serious bias. We demonstrate the feasibility of efficacy evaluation in the absence of untreated controls using field data from Atlantic salmon farmed in the Cobscook Bay region of Maine and treated with SLICE ® during the years 2002–2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most studies on the efficacy of acaricides on Psoroptes spp. have been performed in vivo (Durez & Hargot, 1977; Roberts et al ., 1978; Meleney & Roberts, 1979; Detry, 1985; Wright, 1986; Lonneux & Losson, 1992; Losson & Lonneux, 1992; Lonneux et al ., 1997), more recently increasing interest has been given to in vitro techniques for the evaluation of existing and candidate molecules (Perrucci et al ., 1994, 1995; Mignon & Losson, 1996; Coles & Stafford, 1999). However, most of these trials have been performed on adult mites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%