2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-003-0444-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-dependent proton relaxation in aqueous solutions of some manganese(II) complexes: a new interpretation

Abstract: Field-dependent measurements of the paramagnetic relaxation enhancement for water protons in the presence of Mn(II) complexes ( S=5/2), reported recently, are re-interpreted using theoretical models that take into consideration the fact that the relaxation of the electron spin for S>1 is multiexponential (even in the Redfield limit) and that are valid for an arbitrary relation between the electronic Zeeman interaction and the zero-field splitting in the complex.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate the IS relaxivity, we used the following IS parameters: The number q = 1 of metal-bound water molecules introduced in Equation (6) was derived from independent luminescence decay studies. The Gd-proton distance r H = 3.23 Å used to calculate 1/T 1M according to Equations (18) and (19) was taken to be in the range of the values [5,73] generally obtained for the Gd III complexes and compatible with the known X-rays crystal structures. The lifetime t M was determined so as to be compatible with general features of the experimental longitudinal and transverse relaxivities r 1 and r 2 of the water protons.…”
Section: Nmrd Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To calculate the IS relaxivity, we used the following IS parameters: The number q = 1 of metal-bound water molecules introduced in Equation (6) was derived from independent luminescence decay studies. The Gd-proton distance r H = 3.23 Å used to calculate 1/T 1M according to Equations (18) and (19) was taken to be in the range of the values [5,73] generally obtained for the Gd III complexes and compatible with the known X-rays crystal structures. The lifetime t M was determined so as to be compatible with general features of the experimental longitudinal and transverse relaxivities r 1 and r 2 of the water protons.…”
Section: Nmrd Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the theoretical relaxivity r 1 can no longer be expressed in terms of simple analytical expressions as in the SBM approach. It has to be computed either by setting up and inverting the very large matrices of the superoperator Liouville formalism of the general slow-motion theory [19] or by numerical simulation. [20][21][22] Rather than using the questionable SBM formalism at low field, Troughton et al [60] contented themselves with interpreting the experimental relaxivity above 0.2 T. Indeed, in this "high"-field region, it depends practically only on the longitudinal electronic relaxation rate 1/T 1e , which is given by general expressions of the McLachlan type.…”
Section: Relaxivity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The motion modulating the orientation of the molecular frame and the spin relaxation can be still treated as uncorrelated, because of timescale separation, and the corresponding correlation functions can be separated. This motional regime has been discussed in the context of electron spin relaxation and rotational modulations of the I−S dipole-dipole interaction in [28] and called the "moderatory slow rotation". The treatment breaks down starting from the high field limit since the S spin relaxation is here slower than at low field and therefore more close to the timescale of the motion responsible for the momentary orientation of the molecular and the laboratory frames.…”
Section: And Hmentioning
confidence: 99%