2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4869311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-dependent molecular ionization and excitation energies: Implications for electrically insulating liquids

Abstract: Field dependence on the molecular ionization potential and excitation energies compared to conductivity models for insulation materials at high electric fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are greatly diminished [42][43][44]. The field strength shown in figure 18(b) is the local field around the molecule that is higher than the macroscopic field of figure 18(a) by a factor of 2-10 depending on the type of molecules in the liquid [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…are greatly diminished [42][43][44]. The field strength shown in figure 18(b) is the local field around the molecule that is higher than the macroscopic field of figure 18(a) by a factor of 2-10 depending on the type of molecules in the liquid [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…the Laplacian field) and b: Ionization potential of 1st excited state and the ground state versus field in cyclohexane; data extracted from figure 3 in [42]. The field dependence of the ionization potential and several of the excitation energies of cyclohexane have also been calculated in [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fig. 4, a width of V n * Needle tip curvature r n 6.0 µm Streamer tip curvature [5] r s 6.0 µm Field in streamer [6,51] E s 2.0 kV mm 1 Electron detachment threshold E d 1.0 MV m 1 Avalanche threshold [14] E a 0.2 GV m 1 Scattering constant [14] E ↵ 3.0 GV m 1 Max avalanche growth [14] ↵ m 200 µm 1 Meek constant [8] Q c 23 Electron mobility [42,43] e 45 mm 2 /Vs Anion mobility [11] ion 0.30 mm 2 /Vs Ion conductivity [41] ion 0.20 pS m 1 Base liquid IP [52] I b 10.2 eV Additive IP [53] I a 7.1 eV Additive IP di . factor [8] k ↵ 2.8 eV 1 Additive number density c a,n 0.0 1.5 mm gives about 1 µs before collision, both from the sides and from below.…”
Section: Region Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our purpose in this work is to investigate possible ionization effects associated with crosslinking byproducts. Though the matrix is a solid, this has relation to dielectric liquids, as ionization processes appear to be much better understood in liquids than in solids, with as common driving parameter the ionization potential of molecules [7] to explain streamer propagations in liquids [8] and resistance to treeing processes in solids [9,10] for example. The other link to dielectric liquids is the need to maintain the liquid additive into the matrix and control the product uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%