2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field capacity in soils with a yearly oscillating water table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seasonal comparison with θ confirmed that the relationship between SMD and θ was not consistent over time. Given soil structure change through the year (Holden, ) and dependence on antecedent conditions (Veihmeyer & Hendrickson, ; Cavazza et al ., ), further research is required on hysteresis and nutrient management advice. Seasonal changes in θ were related to soil drainage: the poorer the drainage, the greater the differences between seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seasonal comparison with θ confirmed that the relationship between SMD and θ was not consistent over time. Given soil structure change through the year (Holden, ) and dependence on antecedent conditions (Veihmeyer & Hendrickson, ; Cavazza et al ., ), further research is required on hysteresis and nutrient management advice. Seasonal changes in θ were related to soil drainage: the poorer the drainage, the greater the differences between seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These hydrological assumptions make the model relevant for land and nutrient management as it reflects water movements as a function of water status. However, the meaning of FC is subject to debate (Nachabe, ; Cavazza et al ., ) because of issues related to the water potential used as a standard for measurement, spatial variability, hysteresis and the difficulty of demonstrating when equilibrium is reached (Schuh et al ., ; Pachepsky & Giménez, ). Nevertheless, using the concept of gravity moveable water, Herbin et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both models overestimated the number of days when the soil was at field capacity. The field capacity value used in this study was for the top 0–5 cm of the soil profile and was determined at 5 kPa, but field capacity is a poorly defined variable with a lack of consensus and uncertainty relating to its determination (Cavazza et al. , 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FC is measured at potentials of -10 to -50 kPa (Dane and Topp, 2002;Lal, 2006). However, the water content at -33 kPa matric potential is usually used for moderately coarse-and finer-textured soils Cassel and Nielsen, 1986;Addiscott and Whitmore, 1991;Liu, 1996;Gebregiorgis and Savage, 2006;Lal, 2006;Cavazza and Patruno, 2007;Jabro et al, 2009). Although it is generally acknowledged that undisturbed soil samples are required in the pressure plate method (Cassel and Nielsen, 1986;Gebregiorgis and Savage, 2006), the disturbed soil samples are still favored for they are easier to collect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%