2006 Portland, Oregon, July 9-12, 2006 2006
DOI: 10.13031/2013.20709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field and Pond Hydrologic Analyses With the Spaw Model

Abstract: The authors are solely responsible for the content of this technical presentation. The technical presentation does not necessarily reflect the official position of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE), and its printing and distribution does not constitute an endorsement of views which may be expressed. Technical presentations are not subject to the formal peer review process by ASABE editorial committees; therefore, they are not to be presented as refereed publications. Citatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Los datos sobre los suelos se obtuvieron de la Carta de Reconocimiento de Suelos del Uruguay a una escala de 1:1.000.000 (7) . Para cada unidad de suelo los datos fisicoquímicos se extrajeron de las calicatas representativas y se utilizó el modelo Soil, Plant, Atmosphere, and Water (SPAW) del US Department of Agriculture (USDA) (8) para determinar los contenidos de agua en la saturación, a capacidad de campo y en el punto de marchitez permanente. Además, se consideró la clasificación de los suelos en grupos hidrológicos (GH) realizada por Durán (9) .…”
Section: Zona De Estudiounclassified
“…Los datos sobre los suelos se obtuvieron de la Carta de Reconocimiento de Suelos del Uruguay a una escala de 1:1.000.000 (7) . Para cada unidad de suelo los datos fisicoquímicos se extrajeron de las calicatas representativas y se utilizó el modelo Soil, Plant, Atmosphere, and Water (SPAW) del US Department of Agriculture (USDA) (8) para determinar los contenidos de agua en la saturación, a capacidad de campo y en el punto de marchitez permanente. Además, se consideró la clasificación de los suelos en grupos hidrológicos (GH) realizada por Durán (9) .…”
Section: Zona De Estudiounclassified
“…For parameterisation of the models of MMF‐type models, different approaches have been followed: Feng et al (2014), in a Chinese karst environment on a catchment with an area of some 10 km 2 , collected undisturbed soil samples and transferred them into model parameters using literature values from Morgan (2005), Morgan and Duzant (2008) and PTFs from Saxton et al (2006). Vieira, Prats, et al (2014), on burned forest in Portugal at the plot scale, used rainfall experiments for calibration and validation, and soil water content measured with time‐domain reflectometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%