2018
DOI: 10.1080/23249676.2018.1449675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field and model tests of riprap on steep slopes exposed to overtopping

Abstract: The comparability of large-scale field tests of dumped and placed riprap with a stone diameter of 0.37 m and corresponding model tests in a scale of 1:6.5 was investigated in terms of stability, packing density and visually observed flow pattern. The tested riprap protections were exposed to overtopping on a slope of 1:1.5 (vertical: horizontal). The results for dumped riprap revealed similarity between the field and model tests based on the critical stone-related Froude number as a measure of the stability, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is compounded while dealing with rockfill dam structures built with narrow-steep abutment profiles (Figure 1). Ripraps comprising of large natural rock elements are employed in rockfill dams to protect the downstream slopes against erosion due to leakage or overtopping (Hiller et al 2019 andToledo et al 2015). Further, rockfill dam toes are commonly coupled with the downstream rockfill dam structure to control seepage flow in the zone where it exits the dam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is compounded while dealing with rockfill dam structures built with narrow-steep abutment profiles (Figure 1). Ripraps comprising of large natural rock elements are employed in rockfill dams to protect the downstream slopes against erosion due to leakage or overtopping (Hiller et al 2019 andToledo et al 2015). Further, rockfill dam toes are commonly coupled with the downstream rockfill dam structure to control seepage flow in the zone where it exits the dam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of discharge values of each section for the fixed dam setup are calibrated and validated with the experimental data. This study provides such information, which may be of use in risk assessment as well as for the design of embankment dam riprap on the crest and on the downstream slope, see, for example, Hiller et al [34], for new and existing dams in landslide prone areas. This study is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If the crest is overtopped (Figure 2b,c), the downstream slope is then subjected to highvelocity, turbulent surface flow, provoking a progressive external erosion process that can lead to a dam breach. Ripraps are one of the most employed defence mechanisms for several in-stream hydraulic structures such as embankment dams, spillways, streambeds, riverbanks, bridge piers, and abutments [3][4][5][6][7]. For rockfill dam engineering, ripraps are encountered both on the upstream embankment and on the downstream slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of the riprap structure and resistance against overtopping would help improve the reinforcement and building techniques. Ripraps are one of the most employed defence mechanisms for several in-stream hydraulic structures such as embankment dams, spillways, streambeds, riverbanks, bridge piers, and abutments [3][4][5][6][7]. For rockfill dam engineering, ripraps are encountered both on the upstream embankment and on the downstream slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%