2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.100502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fidelity Criterion for Quantum-Domain Transmission and Storage of Coherent States Beyond the Unit-Gain Constraint

Abstract: We generalize the experimental success criterion for quantum teleportation/memory in continuous-variable quantum systems to be suitable for non-unit-gain condition by considering attenuation/amplification of the coherent-state amplitude. The new criterion can be used for a non-ideal quantum memory and long distance quantum communication as well as quantum devices with amplification process. It is also shown that the framework to measure the average fidelity is capable of detecting all Gaussian channels in quan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
111
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quite surprisingly, the value of the probabilistic benchmark coincides with the value of the deterministic benchmark obtained in Ref. [17], implying that probabilistic MP protocols offer no advantage over deterministic ones in the case of coherent states. All these findings can be obtained from the general result of Theorem 1.…”
Section: A Coherent Statessupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Quite surprisingly, the value of the probabilistic benchmark coincides with the value of the deterministic benchmark obtained in Ref. [17], implying that probabilistic MP protocols offer no advantage over deterministic ones in the case of coherent states. All these findings can be obtained from the general result of Theorem 1.…”
Section: A Coherent Statessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For N = M = 1, the above value coincides with the teleportation benchmark conjectured in [6] and proven in [9], which converges to 1 2 for uniform prior distribution (λ → 0). For general N and M, it reproduces the various bounds given in [16][17][18].…”
Section: A Coherent Statesmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The condition of Eq. (3) was formulated for the quantum benchmark problem [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], however, its utility and significance for the separability problem have little been discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%