Fictional Inquiry—design collaboration in a shared narrative space

Dindler, Christian; Iversen, Ole Sejer

doi:10.1080/15710880701500187

Cited by 108 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For one, it would be useful to try out a range of different methods in order to create a methodological tool-set that is available to researchers. We also have yet to see how concepts from Participatory Design methods, such as narrative framing [10], temporal displacement [43] or the metaphor of magic [29] might transfer to participatory evaluation. Finally, our approach requires intimate knowledge of one child's abilities, interests and favourite activities.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory Evaluation with Autistic Children

Spiel

Malinverni

Good

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participatory Design (PD) has become a standard methodology in HCI, however, the evaluation of the outcomes of participatory processes is often exclusively driven by researcher defined measures of success. Through our work with autistic children, who have radically different life worlds from our own, it became evident that their criteria for the success of a project are most likely also very different. In order to address the limitations of researcher defined and led evaluations in this context, we developed an approach for participatory evaluation called PEACE (Participatory Evaluation with Autistic ChildrEn). Using this approach, we were able to include autistic children in dedicated evaluation phases through the co-definition of goals and methods, joint processes of data gathering and the co-interpretation of results. We discuss three case studies in which we successfully applied our approach and conclude with a reflection on the novel insights created through participatory evaluation and researchers' roles in such a process.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory Evaluation with Autistic Children

Spiel

Malinverni

Good

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dindler e Iversen (2007) proponen una técnica específica de diseño colaborativo denominada "indagación ficticia" que ha mostrado ser muy efectiva trabajando con niños y con familias para moldear actividades de cocreación. La idea general es crear situaciones, escenarios y artefactos parcialmente ficticios, a través de una narrativa compartida, para propiciar que los participantes imaginen futuros deseados.…”

Section: La Propuesta Metodológicaunclassified

Artefactos, afectos, animales: propuesta teórico-metodológica para la apropiación de valores locales desde el diseño

Vásquez¹,

Luengas²

2018

masd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Iversen & Dindler [32] investigate what they refer to as 'aesthetic inquiry' in Participatory design. Their understanding of aesthetics is inspired by Dewey [30] and Shusterman [108]:…”

Section: Theoretical Sources Of Inspirationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…"We use the term 'aesthetic' in the pragmatist sense, as a profoundly meaningful transformation that provides a refreshed attitude towards the practices of everyday life, and as a change in our modes of perceiving and acting in the world." [32] They understand Participatory Design in the way Ehn [39] coined it:"as the relation between tradition and transcendence; the tension between understanding and appreciating the existing, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the creation of new knowledge and practice." Aesthetic Inquiry is then "tipping the scale towards transcendence" [32] through the introduction of so-called Transcendent elements and Anchoring elements.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

While working around security

Mathiasen

Pedersen

Bødker

2011

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human Computer Interaction - IndiaHCI '11

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Users of technology encounter various IT security mechanisms in their everyday lives. If these mechanisms fail to support everyday activities, they either get in the way, or the users find a way to work around them. Even though users manage to carry out everyday activities by using substandard IT security mechanisms or via workarounds, it will influence their experience of security. If researchers and designers only focus on IT security artifacts and fail to take the user experience into account, incorrect processes or workarounds will occur. Accordingly, to get users to follow the correct process may seem to be a criterion of success, even though it may yield a less appropriate experience of security.This dissertation deals with an improved understanding of IT security sensitive IT artifacts and presents three design methods, and a framework for addressing the complexities and contingencies of security experiences in design. The methods: Mobile probing, Prompted exploration workshops, and Acting out security involve potential future users in the process of designing IT security sensitive IT artifacts. Mobile probing collects narratives of user encounters with IT security. Prompted exploration workshops present the users with seven themes and involve them in the design of IT security sensitive IT artifacts. Acting out security lets users try out prototypes in situations where security handling is infrequent and quick. All three methods have been developed and deployed as an integral part of a research through design process. An everyday mobile digital signature solution has been designed, and the design problem, the design process, and the design results are presented in this dissertation.Several of my empirical findings show that the way users experience security does matter. Users' experiences of security influence the way they make sense of, assess, and handle IT security mechanisms. Moreover, I studied cases in which the users handled IT security sensitive technology in a secure way, but still had unwanted experiences of security. Through the developed design methods I was able to activate and access study participants' prior experiences of making sense of IT security sensitive technology. Moreover, the methods helped clarify users' immediate experience in an encounter with IT security sensitive technology. The findings were integrated into the design of a digital signature solution, and in this process I developed a framework for structuring empirical findings for the design of IT security sensitive IT artifacts. v Resume Hver dag møder mennesker IT-sikkerhed på mange forskellige måder. Nogle IT-sikkerhedsmekanismer er indrettet, så de ikke understøtter de aktiviteter, de indgår i. Enten kommer de i vejen og brugerne må opgive deres forehavende, eller også finder brugerne en måde at omgå sikkerheden på. Selv om brugerne formår at anvende IT på trods af at IT-sikkerhedsmekanismerne kommer i vejen, kan deres oplevelse af og erfaring med IT-sikkerhed sagtens vaere uhensigtsmaessig. Hvis forskere i og d...

show abstract

Fictional Inquiry—design collaboration in a shared narrative space

Cited by 108 publications

References 18 publications

Participatory Evaluation with Autistic Children

Participatory Evaluation with Autistic Children

Artefactos, afectos, animales: propuesta teórico-metodológica para la apropiación de valores locales desde el diseño

While working around security

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About